Informação da revista
Vol. 41. Núm. 3.
Páginas 229-230 (Março 2022)
Baixar PDF
Mais opções do artigo
Vol. 41. Núm. 3.
Páginas 229-230 (Março 2022)
Editorial comment
Open Access
Impact of the first COVID-19 wave on quality of care in acute coronary syndrome – the importance of information for health policy design
Impacto da primeira vaga COVID-19 na qualidade de tratamento da síndrome coronária aguda – a importância da informação na definição de política de saúde
Eduardo Infante de Oliveiraa,b,c,d
a Associação Portuguesa de Intervenção Cardiovascular, Lisboa, Portugal
b Hospital Lusíadas Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
c Hospital de Santa Cruz, CHLO, Carnaxide, Portugal
d Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
Conteúdo relacionado
Hélder Pereira, Christoph Naber, Sandrine Wallace, Tóth Gabor, Sayfollah Abdi, Bagrat Alekyan, Thomas Alexander, Carolina Artucio, Ignacio Batista, Alfonsina Candiello, Rhena Delport, Leonardo De Luca, Andrejs Erglis, Pedro Farto-Abreu, Wei-Chung Huang, John Kanakakis, Michael Lee, Awad Mohamed, Dejan Orlić, Patricio Orti, Mohamed Sobh, Khaled Shokry, Ibrahim Terzic, Kyaw Win, Jan Piek
Informação do artigo
Texto Completo
Baixar PDF
Texto Completo

The recent and ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has imposed major stresses and pressure for adaptation on healthcare systems, with high resource consumption focused on a single threat, and has compromised the accessibility of diagnosis and treatment in major health areas, with short- and long-term consequences that are not yet fully understood.

The current edition of the Journal1 presents the results of a multinational survey by the Stent-Save a Life (SSL) initiative that explores and illustrates the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on the rate of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The authors used a cross-sectional descriptive and observational design to compare the numbers of acute coronary syndrome (ACS)/STEMI admissions and rates of PPCI in March and April 2020 with the corresponding period of the previous year. Information was collected from 17 of the 32 SSL member countries using data from national registries or from local non-nationwide databases.

These options resulted in significant methodological constraints. Collection of data was heterogeneous. The study design was the least informative of all choices, comparing just two points in time, not considering pre-existing trends or concurrent factors. Regression discontinuity or interrupted time series would be more appropriate designs but would require robust and systematic data collection, which is not feasible in many countries. The time lag of the first COVID-19 wave between countries could have been explored through the use of a difference in differences analysis or synthetic control models, attenuating the effect of concurrent factors. However, the latter option would have required the extraction of large quantities of data, which once again would not be available in many countries. These methodological limitations, which are shared by many other contemporary publications,2–13 should be the first point on which to reflect. To adequately assess quality of care in ACS, more and better information would be needed. Quality improvement interventions should be focused on the needs and weaknesses of healthcare systems, which can only be identified through the analysis of robust data. Moreover, the effect of such interventions can only be properly assessed through the analysis of valid information collected systematically over time. The implementation of pragmatic and affordable nationwide registries, using meaningful and easily auditable variables, should be a priority in the fight for better ACS outcomes.

The authors reported decreases in admissions for ACS (mean reduction 27.5%), STEMI (mean reduction 20.5%) and PPCI rate (mean reduction 26.7%) in 16 out of 17 countries. Despite the above-mentioned methodological limitations, it is likely that the first COVID-19 wave had a significant impact across a variety of geographical areas, considering the consistency and volume of the reported variations, as well as data reported by other authors.2–13 It is important to note that the impact of COVID-19 cases was relatively low in many of the studied countries in the period under analysis, and therefore the fall in admissions cannot be attributed to overloading of healthcare systems. In these countries, in the period under study, hospital avoidance due to fear of exposure may have played a pivotal role. This hypothesis could have been tested with population surveys and by looking for indirect indicators such as increased late presentation of ACS and ACS mortality. Nonetheless, these indicators also require collection of good quality data. In this regard, the authors cited a study based on the Lombardia Cardiac Arrest Registry in Italy,7 which indicated a possible increase in untreated ACS cases revealed by a rise in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests during the first COVID-19 wave. However, it is not possible to establish a causal relationship, and other factors may have contributed or may even have been more important. Reports on the impact on mortality failed to irrefutably prove an increase in cardiovascular mortality, once again due to limitations in data collection.

On the other hand, the authors speculate on the possibility that there was a real decrease in the incidence of ACS, which is possible considering the beneficial effects of a general lockdown (lower levels of air and sound pollution, elimination of traffic-associated stress, remote working, etc.). This hypothesis could have been partially tested by comparing countries with different lockdown policies.

In summary, the authors express their concern about the quality of care and accessibility of timely treatment in the setting of ACS. The reductions in admissions may have resulted from a loss of trust in healthcare institutions and a failure of communication between health policy leaders and the general population. The authors stress the need to overcome barriers imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, by establishing action plans, protocols and developing awareness campaigns. I could not agree more with this message. Empirically, the interventional cardiology and emergency medicine communities had the perception that the pandemic had a profound impact on the care of acute non-COVID-19 patients. However, it was not easy to convey this message to decision makers. Presentation of clear evidence was difficult due to the lack of consistent and good quality data in the majority of countries. Therefore, policy adjustments often did not occur, or occurred too late. Extracting data from public health systems, building evidence and responding promptly to acute changes is not an easy task. The systematic collection of meaningful and robust data that are accessible for analysis and interpretation is a necessary step on the way to improving quality and policy decisions. Nationwide registries should be promoted by medical societies, academic institutions, health providers and healthcare policy makers. Evidence-based health policy always relies on good quality information.

Conflicts of interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

H. Pereira, C. Naver, S. Wallace, et al.
Stent-Save a life international survey on the practice of primary percutaneous coronary intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Rev Port Cardiol, 41 (2022),
G. Pessoa-Amorim, C. Camm, P. Gajendragadkar, et al.
Admission of patients with STEMI since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. A survey by the European Society of Cardiology.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes, 6 (2020), pp. 210-216
O. Rodríguez-Leor, B. Cid-Álvarez, S. Ojeda, et al.
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare activity in interventional cardiology in Spain.
REC Interv Cardiol, (2020),
O. De Filippo, F. D’Ascenzo, F. Angelini, et al.
Reduced rate of hospital admissions for ACS during Covid-19 outbreak in northern Italy.
N Engl J Med, 383 (2020), pp. 88-89
B. Metzler, P. Siostrzonek, R. Binder, et al.
Decline of acute coronary syndrome admissions in Austria since the outbreak of COVID-19: the pandemic response causes cardiac collateral damage.
Eur Heart J, 41 (2020), pp. 1852-1853
S. De Rosa, C. Spaccarotella, C. Basso, et al.
Reduction of hospitalizations for myocardial infarction in Italy in the COVID-19 era.
Eur Heart J, 41 (2020), pp. 2083-2088
E. Baldi, G. Sechi, R. Primi, et al.
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the Covid-19 outbreak in Italy.
N Engl J Med, 383 (2020), pp. 496-498
E. Zitelny, N. Newman, D. Zhao.
STEMI during the COVID-19 pandemic – an evaluation of incidence.
M. Solomon, E. McNulty, J. Rana, et al.
The Covid-19 pandemic and the incidence of acute myocardial infarction.
N Engl J Med, 383 (2020), pp. 691-693
S. Garcia, M. Albaghdadi, P. Meraj, et al.
Reduction in ST-segment elevation cardiac catheterization laboratory activations in the United States during COVID-19 pandemic.
J Am Coll Cardiol, 75 (2020), pp. 2871-2872
C.F. Tam, K.S. Cheung, S. Lam, et al.
Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction care in Hong-Kong, China.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 13 (2020), pp. e006631
J. Mayol, C. Artucio, I. Batista, et al.
An international survey in Latin America on the practice of interventional cardiology during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a particular focus on myocardial infarction.
Neth Heart J, 28 (2020), pp. 424-430
Y.H. Li, W.C. Huang, J.J. Hwang, et al.
No reduction of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction admission in Taiwan during coronavirus pandemic.
Copyright © 2022. Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia
Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia

Receba a nossa Newsletter

Opções de artigo
en pt

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

Ao assinalar que é «Profissional de Saúde», declara conhecer e aceitar que a responsável pelo tratamento dos dados pessoais dos utilizadores da página de internet da Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (RPC), é esta entidade, com sede no Campo Grande, n.º 28, 13.º, 1700-093 Lisboa, com os telefones 217 970 685 e 217 817 630, fax 217 931 095 e com o endereço de correio eletrónico Declaro para todos os fins, que assumo inteira responsabilidade pela veracidade e exatidão da afirmação aqui fornecida.