Journal Information
Vol. 35. Issue 5.
Pages 309.e1-309.e6 (May 2016)
Visits
7123
Vol. 35. Issue 5.
Pages 309.e1-309.e6 (May 2016)
Case report
Open Access
Two potentially fatal surprises in the preoperative assessment of an asymptomatic young adult
Duas surpresas potencialmente fatais em avaliação pré-operatória de adulto jovem assintomático
Visits
7123
Antonio José Lagoeiro Jorge
Corresponding author
lagoeiro@globo.com

Corresponding author.
, Antonio Alves do Couto, Evandro Tinoco Mesquita, Mario Luiz Ribeiro, Celso Vale de Souza Junior, Wolney de Andrade Martins
Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (4)
Show moreShow less
Abstract

Isolated left ventricular non-compaction is a rare disease classified as a primary genetic cardiomyopathy and is characterized by heart failure, systemic embolism and ventricular arrhythmias. The diagnosis is established by Doppler echocardiography. We report the case of an asymptomatic young adult, with no history of heart disease, who underwent preoperative assessment for low-risk orthopedic surgery. The electrocardiogram showed left bundle branch block, which prompted further investigation with Doppler echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. A diagnosis of isolated left ventricular non-compaction and pulmonary embolism was made. Some aspects of preoperative assessment in low-risk surgical patients are discussed.

Keywords:
Isolated left ventricular non-compaction
Preoperative care
Pulmonary embolism
Resumo

A cardiomiopatia não compactada isolada do ventrículo é uma doença rara, classificada como uma cardiomiopatia genética primária. A doença é caracterizada por insuficiência cardíaca, embolia sistémica e arritmias ventriculares. O diagnóstico é estabelecido pelo ecodopplercardiograma. Relata-se o caso de adulto jovem assintomático, sem história prévia de cardiopatia, que realizou avaliação pré-operatória para cirurgia ortopédica de baixo risco. Eletrocardiograma apresentou bloqueio do ramo esquerdo, que suscitou investigação complementar com ecodopplercardiograma, angiotomografia do tórax e ressonância cardíaca. Concluiu-se pelo diagnóstico de cardiopatia não compactada isolada do ventrículo e embolia pulmonar. Discutem-se aspetos da avaliação pré-operatória em pacientes de baixo risco cirúrgico.

Palavras-chave:
Miocárdio ventricular isolado não compactado
Cuidados pré-operatórios
Embolia pulmonar
Full Text
Introduction

Isolated left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) was described for the first time by Chin et al. in 1990.1 It is a rare disease classified as a primary genetic cardiomyopathy by the American Heart Association.2 LVNC is attributed to intrauterine arrest of compaction of the meshwork of the fetal myocardium.3

The prevalence of LVNC in the general population is unknown. Existing information is mainly derived from patients undergoing Doppler echocardiography. A Swiss review identified 34 cases, corresponding to 0.014% of all echocardiograms performed over a period of 15 years.4 The prevalence of LVNC in patients with heart failure (HF) has been estimated as 3–4%.5 It appears to affect predominantly males, as shown in the four main series on LVNC patients.1,4,6,7

A family history of LVNC is described in 12–50% of case reports.8 Autosomal dominant inheritance is more common than X-linked or autosomal recessive inheritance.9 There is growing recognition of a considerable overlap in the genetic loci involved in the pathogenesis of the main cardiomyopathies. Phenotypic expression of different cardiomyopathies may be found in the same patient, including LVNC and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy,10 although LVNC is more commonly associated with congenital heart disease and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.11

Preoperative assessment provides an opportunity for the physician to identify silent conditions and to optimize treatment of known cardiovascular disease. In recent years, in an attempt to avoid wasting resources on unnecessary medical exams, medical societies have established protocols for requests for preoperative exams. An editorial by the Cleveland Clinic,12 which is in agreement with the II Preoperative Guideline of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology (SBC),13 questions the value of the electrocardiogram (ECG) in preoperative assessment of asymptomatic individuals scheduled for low-risk surgery.

Case report

A 35-year-old man with partial rupture of the left Achilles tendon caused by a sports accident was referred by the surgeon for preoperative assessment. He had no cardiovascular symptoms or history of heart disease, was not taking prescription medication and did not smoke. Physical examination revealed blood pressure of 135/78 mmHg and heart rate of 89 bpm and no relevant alterations. He had a walking boot on his left leg. The chest X-ray was normal, and complete blood panel, blood glucose, plasma creatinine, urea and international normalized ratio were within reference values. The ECG showed complete left bundle branch block (LBBB). Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) revealed left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) of 61%, left atrial volume index of 22 ml/m2, and LV mass index of 94.9 g/m2. Alterations in LV relaxation (E′=6 cm/s) and increased filling pressures (E/E′=16) were observed. TDI showed hypertrabeculation of the mid anterolateral wall and apical region (Figure 1). As the differential diagnosis of LVNC includes other forms of cardiomyopathy, the patient was referred for computed tomography coronary angiography, which showed signs of bilateral pulmonary embolism (Figure 2). D-dimers were 2310 ng/ml. Doppler echocardiography of the venous system of the left leg demonstrated hypoechogenic material in the popliteal and posterior tibial veins, partially obstructing the lumen. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (Figure 3) showed LV hypertrophy and marked mid-apical subendocardial trabeculation (estimated at 22% of total myocardial mass), myocardial late enhancement indicative of mid anteroseptal and basal mid inferoseptal myocardial fibrosis, and moderate global LV dysfunction, with LVEF estimated at 38%, confirming the diagnosis of LVNC.

Figure 1.

Echocardiogram, apical 4-chamber view, showing global left ventricular systolic dysfunction located mainly in the mid anterolateral and apical walls. Non-compaction is also more prominent in the subendocardial myocardium than in the subepicardial region.

(0.08MB).
Figure 2.

Computed tomography angiography showing signs of pulmonary embolism (arrows).

(0.67MB).
Figure 3.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showing left ventricular hypertrophy with increased trabeculation of the mid and apical walls.

(0.24MB).

Outpatient Holter 24-hour electrocardiographic monitoring showed an episode of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular extrasystoles (Figure 4), but the patient remained asymptomatic.

Figure 4.

24-hour Holter ECG monitoring showing an episode of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.

(0.3MB).
Discussion

LVNC is a rare disease characterized by excessive trabeculation of the LV wall and intratrabecular recesses communicating with the LV chamber. In most cases it is diagnosed in infancy, but symptoms may not appear until adulthood. Its incidence is estimated at 0.05% in the adult population.2

LVNC is usually associated with other congenital heart disease such as atrial and septal defects. Isolated LVNC (in the absence of other congenital defects) is even rarer.14

The diagnostic criteria proposed by Jenni et al.15 are designed to distinguish isolated LVNC from other forms of LV hypertrophy. The criteria are (1) at least four prominent trabecula and deep intertrabecular recesses; (2) blood flow in the recesses demonstrable with color Doppler; (3) the non-compacted segments mainly involve the apex and the inferior and mid portions of the LV wall; (4) the non-compacted segments typically have a two-layer structure with a ratio between the subendocardial non-compacted layer and the subepicardial compacted layer of >2:1; (5) coexisting cardiac abnormalities are absent.15

Diagnosis of LVNC in adults is challenging due to its similarity to more common conditions such as dilated hypertensive heart disease, infiltrative cardiomyopathy, apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and endomyocardial eosinophilic disease. Early diagnosis is important because of the high risk of HF, fatal ventricular arrhythmias and embolism.6

Prognosis is poor and the treatment for end-stage HF is cardiac transplantation. Life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias are an indication for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. The main mechanisms of death in LVNC are sudden death and refractory HF.16

The patient presented here, although asymptomatic, was classified as having stage B HF according to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines,17 as he presented structural and functional alterations, including systolic dysfunction. Such patients are at high risk of developing symptomatic HF and so prompt treatment is indicated.17

The pulmonary embolism diagnosed in our patient appears to have been due to immobilization of the left leg and unrelated to LVNC, which increases risk for arterial thromboembolism and hence stroke.18

Cardiologists are routinely called upon to assess patients’ preoperative risk. The aim is to identify undiagnosed conditions that could increase risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality and to suggest ways to reduce the risk.19,20 Assessment is always multifactorial and risk factors for postoperative cardiac events include the type of procedure and factors specific to the patient.21 Routine ECG assessment is not recommended for patients at low cardiac risk about to undergo low-risk surgery, since it could delay the operation unnecessarily, increase costs and increase patient anxiety.12 Some guidelines do suggest a preoperative ECG, but such recommendations are generally based on low-level evidence and the opinion of specialists.22

The SBC recommends preoperative ECG in selected cases, but considers routine ECG a class III recommendation, level of evidence C, for asymptomatic individuals undergoing low-risk surgery.13

In the case presented, the ECG requested by the surgeon showed complete LBBB, and since LBBB has prognostic significance even in asymptomatic individuals, or those without known heart disease,23 it was decided to perform TDI, which led to a diagnosis of LVNC.

Conclusion

The ECG is a low-cost and accessible tool for identifying myocardial disease and arrhythmias. A routine ECG in preoperative assessment may help identify conditions that, although asymptomatic, could increase perioperative risk. In the case presented the early diagnosis of LVNC, a condition that can lead to HF, thromboembolic events, ventricular tachyarrhythmias and death, enabled the patient to receive a better quality of care. The recommendation in the SBC guidelines not to perform ECG routinely in preoperative assessment is based on the opinion of specialists, and the question should be settled definitively by means of methodologically robust studies.

Ethical disclosuresProtection of human and animal subjects

The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Confidentiality of data

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Right to privacy and informed consent

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Funding

There was no external funding for this article.

Academic links

This article is part of the heart failure research component of the Post-Graduate Course in Cardiovascular Science at Universidade Federal Fluminense.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References
[1]
T.K. Chin, J.K. Perlof, R.G. Williams, et al.
Isolated noncompaction of left ventricular myocardium: a study of eight cases.
Circulation, 82 (1990), pp. 507-513
[2]
B.J. Maron, J.A. Towbin, G. Thiene, et al.
Contemporary definitions and classification of the cardiomyopathies: an American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee; Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention.
Circulation, 113 (2006), pp. 1807-1816
[3]
D.J. Henderson, R.H. Anderson.
The development and structure of the ventricles in the human heart.
Pediatr Cardiol, 30 (2009), pp. 588-596
[4]
E.N. Oechslin, C.H. Attenhofer Jost, J.R. Rojas, et al.
Long-term follow-up of 34 adults with isolated left ventricular noncompaction: a distinct cardiomyopathy with poor prognosis.
J Am Coll Cardiol, 36 (2000), pp. 493-500
[5]
T. Kovacevic-Preradovic, R. Jenni, E.N. Oechslin, et al.
Isolated left ventricular noncompaction as a cause for heart failure and heart transplantation: a single center experience.
Cardiology, 112 (2009), pp. 158-164
[6]
M. Ritter, E. Oechslin, G. Sütsch, et al.
Isolated noncompaction of the myocardium in adults.
Mayo Clin Proc, 72 (1997), pp. 26-31
[7]
F. Ichida, Y. Hamamichi, T. Miyawaki, et al.
Clinical features of isolated noncompaction of the ventricular myocardium: long-term clinical course, hemodynamic properties, and genetic background.
J Am Coll Cardiol, 34 (1999), pp. 233-240
[8]
B.C. Weiford, V.D. Subbarao, K.M. Mulhern.
Noncompaction of the ventricular myocardium.
Circulation, 109 (2004), pp. 2965-2971
[9]
M.V. Zaragoza, E. Arbustini, J. Narula.
Noncompaction of the left ventricle: primary cardiomyopathy with an elusive genetic etiology.
Curr Opin Pediatr, 19 (2007), pp. 619-627
[10]
A. Kelley-Hedgepeth, J.A. Towbin, M.S. Maron.
Images in cardiovascular medicine. Overlapping phenotypes: left ventricular noncompaction and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Circulation, 119 (2009), pp. e588-e589
[11]
L.V. Rosa, V.M.C. Salemi, L.M. Alexandre, et al.
Miocardiopatia não compactada - uma visão atual.
Arq Bras Cardiol, 97 (2011), pp. e13-e19
[12]
P. Sharma, S. Dhungel, A. Prabhakaran.
Should all patients have a resting 12-lead ECG before elective noncardiac surgery?.
Cleve Clin J Med, 10 (2014), pp. 594-596
[13]
D.M. Gualandro, P.C. Yu, D. Calderaro, et al.
II Diretriz de Avaliação Perioperatória da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia.
Arq Bras Cardiol, 96 (2011), pp. 1-68
[14]
J. Elias, W. Valadão, R. Kuniyoshi, et al.
Miocárdio não compactado isolado.
Arq Bras Cardiol, 74 (2000), pp. 253-261
[15]
R. Jenni, E. Oechnlin, J. Schneider, et al.
Echocardiographic and pathoanatomical characteristics of isolated left ventricular non-compaction: a step towards classification as a distinct cardiomyopathy.
Heart, 86 (2001), pp. 666-671
[16]
I.A. Khan, W.P. Biddle, S.A. Najeed, et al.
Isolated non-compaction cardiomyopathy presenting with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia – case report and literature review.
Angiology, 54 (2003), pp. 243-250
[17]
S.A. Hunt, W.T. Abraham, M.H. Chin, et al.
ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure).
Circulation, 112 (2005), pp. 1825-1852
[18]
S. Pitta, D. Thatai, L. Afonso.
Thromboembolic complications of left ventricular noncompaction: case report and brief review of the literature.
J Clin Ultrasound, 35 (2007), pp. 465-468
[19]
L.A. Fleisher, K.E. Fleischmann, A.D. Auerbach, et al.
2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.
J Nucl Cardiol, 22 (2015), pp. 162-215
[20]
M.A. Feely, C.S. Collins, P.R. Daniels, et al.
Preoperative testing before noncardiac surgery: guidelines and recommendations.
Am Fam Physician, 87 (2013), pp. 414-418
[21]
T.H. Lee, E.R. Marcantonio, C.M. Mangione, et al.
Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery.
Circulation, 100 (1999), pp. 1043-1049
[22]
J.L. Apfelbaum, R.T. Connis, D.G. Nickinovich, Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters, et al.
Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation.
Anesthesiology, 116 (2012), pp. 522-538
[23]
R. Imanishi, S. Seto, S. Ichimaru, et al.
Prognostic significance of incident complete left bundle branch block observed over a 40-year period.
Am J Cardiol, 98 (2006), pp. 644-648

Please cite this article as: Antonio José AJ, do Couto AA, Mesquita ET, Ribeiro ML, de Souza Junior CV, de Andrade Martins W. Duas surpresas potencialmente fatais em avaliação pré-operatória de adulto jovem assintomático. Rev Port Cardiol. 2016;35:309.e1–309.e6.

Copyright © 2015. Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia
Download PDF
Idiomas
Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English edition)
Article options
Tools
en pt

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

By checking that you are a health professional, you are stating that you are aware and accept that the Portuguese Journal of Cardiology (RPC) is the Data Controller that processes the personal information of users of its website, with its registered office at Campo Grande, n.º 28, 13.º, 1700-093 Lisbon, telephone 217 970 685 and 217 817 630, fax 217 931 095, and email revista@spc.pt. I declare for all purposes that the information provided herein is accurate and correct.