que se leu este artigo
array:25 [ "pii" => "S0870255115003637" "issn" => "08702551" "doi" => "10.1016/j.repc.2015.09.018" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2016-02-01" "aid" => "759" "copyright" => "Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia" "copyrightAnyo" => "2016" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Rev Port Cardiol. 2016;35:73-8" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 2463 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 212 "HTML" => 1630 "PDF" => 621 ] ] "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:20 [ "pii" => "S2174204916000234" "issn" => "21742049" "doi" => "10.1016/j.repce.2016.01.012" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2016-02-01" "aid" => "759" "copyright" => "Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Rev Port Cardiol. 2016;35:73-8" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 2156 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 172 "HTML" => 1531 "PDF" => 453 ] ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original Article</span>" "titulo" => "Validation of two US risk scores for percutaneous coronary intervention in a single-center Portuguese population of patients with acute coronary syndrome" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "pt" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "73" "paginaFinal" => "78" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "pt" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Validação de dois <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">scores</span> de risco americanos para a intervenção coronária percutânea num estudo unicêntrico da população portuguesa para doentes com síndrome coronária aguda" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "pt" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1341 "Ancho" => 1604 "Tamanyo" => 138174 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Area under the curve for the three models. GRACE: Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score; MCRS: Mayo Clinic risk score; NCDR: National Cardiovascular Data Registry risk score.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Ana T. Timóteo, André V. Monteiro, Guilherme Portugal, Pedro Teixeira, Helena Aidos, Maria L. Ferreira, Rui C. Ferreira" "autores" => array:7 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Ana T." "apellidos" => "Timóteo" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "André V." "apellidos" => "Monteiro" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Guilherme" "apellidos" => "Portugal" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Pedro" "apellidos" => "Teixeira" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Helena" "apellidos" => "Aidos" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Maria L." "apellidos" => "Ferreira" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Rui" "apellidos" => "C. Ferreira" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S0870255115003637" "doi" => "10.1016/j.repc.2015.09.018" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0870255115003637?idApp=UINPBA00004E" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2174204916000234?idApp=UINPBA00004E" "url" => "/21742049/0000003500000002/v2_201703220311/S2174204916000234/v2_201703220311/en/main.assets" ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S0870255115003649" "issn" => "08702551" "doi" => "10.1016/j.repc.2015.12.003" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2016-02-01" "aid" => "760" "documento" => "simple-article" "crossmark" => 1 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "dis" "cita" => "Rev Port Cardiol. 2016;35:79-81" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 2353 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 153 "HTML" => 1609 "PDF" => 591 ] ] "pt" => array:10 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Comentário editorial</span>" "titulo" => "Avaliação do risco e uso apropriado da intervenção coronária percutânea. Portagem manual ou via verde eletrónica automática?" "tienePdf" => "pt" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "pt" "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "79" "paginaFinal" => "81" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Risk assessment in percutaneous coronary intervention and appropriate use criteria: Manual or automatic?" ] ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "pt" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "pt" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Rui Campante Teles" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Rui" "apellidos" => "Campante Teles" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "pt" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S2174204916000222" "doi" => "10.1016/j.repce.2016.01.011" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2174204916000222?idApp=UINPBA00004E" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0870255115003649?idApp=UINPBA00004E" "url" => "/08702551/0000003500000002/v1_201602130045/S0870255115003649/v1_201602130045/pt/main.assets" ] "asociados" => array:1 [ 0 => array:19 [ "pii" => "S0870255115003649" "issn" => "08702551" "doi" => "10.1016/j.repc.2015.12.003" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2016-02-01" "aid" => "760" "documento" => "simple-article" "crossmark" => 1 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "dis" "cita" => "Rev Port Cardiol. 2016;35:79-81" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 2353 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 153 "HTML" => 1609 "PDF" => 591 ] ] "pt" => array:10 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Comentário editorial</span>" "titulo" => "Avaliação do risco e uso apropriado da intervenção coronária percutânea. Portagem manual ou via verde eletrónica automática?" "tienePdf" => "pt" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "pt" "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "79" "paginaFinal" => "81" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Risk assessment in percutaneous coronary intervention and appropriate use criteria: Manual or automatic?" ] ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "pt" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "pt" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Rui Campante Teles" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Rui" "apellidos" => "Campante Teles" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "pt" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S2174204916000222" "doi" => "10.1016/j.repce.2016.01.011" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2174204916000222?idApp=UINPBA00004E" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0870255115003649?idApp=UINPBA00004E" "url" => "/08702551/0000003500000002/v1_201602130045/S0870255115003649/v1_201602130045/pt/main.assets" ] ] "en" => array:19 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original Article</span>" "titulo" => "Validation of two US risk scores for percutaneous coronary intervention in a single-center Portuguese population of patients with acute coronary syndrome" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "73" "paginaFinal" => "78" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "Ana T. Timóteo, André V. Monteiro, Guilherme Portugal, Pedro Teixeira, Helena Aidos, Maria L. Ferreira, Rui C. Ferreira" "autores" => array:7 [ 0 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "Ana T." "apellidos" => "Timóteo" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "ana_timoteo@yahoo.com" ] "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "André V." "apellidos" => "Monteiro" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Guilherme" "apellidos" => "Portugal" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Pedro" "apellidos" => "Teixeira" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Helena" "apellidos" => "Aidos" "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span>" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Maria L." "apellidos" => "Ferreira" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Rui" "apellidos" => "C. Ferreira" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Cardiology Department, Santa Marta Hospital, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal" "etiqueta" => "a" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Minalytics, Advanced Solutions for Data Mining and Analytics, Lisbon, Portugal" "etiqueta" => "b" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] 2 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Instituto de Telecomunicações, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal" "etiqueta" => "c" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "pt" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Validação de dois <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">scores</span> de risco americanos para a intervenção coronária percutânea num estudo unicêntrico da população portuguesa para doentes com síndrome coronária aguda" ] ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 776 "Ancho" => 3356 "Tamanyo" => 173760 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Calibration of the three scores (plots of predicted vs. observed probability of death for the three scores). NCDR: National Cardiovascular Data Registry.</p>" ] ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0065">Introduction</span><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Risk stratification is essential in the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), particularly in non-ST-elevation ACS. ACS patients are a heterogeneous group of patients in terms of risk, which has important implications for management strategies. Early risk stratification is therefore essential.</p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score is the most widely used risk score due to its high predictive accuracy.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0075"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> Two groups in the US have developed more recent risk scores for stratification of patients undergoing coronary angioplasty, including patients with ACS.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0080"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,3</span></a></p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">We sought to validate these US risk scores in a European population of patients with ACS and to compare their predictive accuracy with that of the classical GRACE risk score.</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0070">Methods</span><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">All consecutive adult patients (aged ≥18 years) included in a single-center registry on ACS between January 1, 2005 and October 31, 2013 were eligible. This is a continuous, prospective and observational registry. Inclusion criteria were a history of chest pain at rest or other symptoms suggestive of an ACS within 24 hours before admission associated with new or presumed new ECG changes (significant ST-T wave changes or left bundle branch block) and/or dynamic changes in levels of biomarkers of myocardial necrosis. ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was defined as persistent (>20 minutes) ST-segment elevation. All other cases were considered non-ST-elevation ACS.</p><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Data were recorded in a database that included demographic, clinical and patient management characteristics, as well as hospital outcome. Hypertension, diabetes and hyperlipidemia were defined as either previously known or on specific therapy. Patients were classified as smokers if they had smoked during the previous six months and were self-reported.</p><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Decisions regarding patient management strategy, including referral for coronary angiography and myocardial revascularization, either by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), were left to the discretion of the attending physician. Only patients undergoing PCI were eligible for the present study.</p><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">For each patient a score was retrospectively assigned according to the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) risk score, the Mayo Clinic risk score (MCRS) and the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0075"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1–3</span></a></p><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality during the index hospitalization.</p><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Other outcomes were also recorded in the study population: stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) and major bleeding. Stroke/TIA was defined as the presence of new neurological symptoms with signs of ischemia or bleeding on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Major bleeding was defined according to the Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) criteria as intracranial bleeding or bleeding that caused hemodynamic compromise requiring intervention.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0090"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a></p><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Informed consent was obtained from each patient. The study protocol conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institution's human research committee.</p><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0075">Statistical analysis</span><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Categorical variables are reported as percentages and continuous variables as means (standard deviation [SD]).</p><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Concerning the variables included in the risk scores, we found missing data in 6.6% of patients for heart rate, 6.3% for systolic blood pressure and 3.7% for creatinine on admission in the study population. Qualitative left ventricular ejection fraction was also missing in 8.3%. A missing values analysis was performed, which showed that these values were missing completely at random, which was confirmed by Little's MCAR test (p=0.137). A multiple imputation technique based on a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach was used to estimate the missing values for each of the missing data points in the study, including death. A primary model included imputed variables, with a secondary model that excluded patients with missing variables to determine the consistency of the general findings with each approach. The imputation of missing values did not change the means of the variables.</p><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Goodness of fit for each model was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. In this test, a high (non-significant) p-value indicates that the model is performing well and has a good fit. Since we aimed to compare different models using the same data and predicting the same outcome, we also analyzed and compared pseudo R-squared statistics. A higher pseudo R-squared value indicates which model better predicts the outcome. Discriminative ability was assessed by the area under the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve (AUC). The AUC provides a measure of the model's ability to discriminate between subjects who experience the outcome of interest and those who do not. To compare the AUC of each of these models, the method described by DeLong et al. was used.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> Calibration was tested with a comparison of the observed frequencies of patients with the event of interest with the expected frequencies based on the values of the estimated probabilities obtained by the logistic regression models.</p><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) indices were also calculated. The net proportion of patients who died (with events) with higher probabilities of death (NRI<span class="elsevierStyleInf">events</span>) and of patients who did not die (without events) with lower probabilities of death (NRI<span class="elsevierStyleInf">nonevents</span>) were calculated considering each group of models. NRI<span class="elsevierStyleInf">total</span> is the sum of NRI<span class="elsevierStyleInf">events</span> and NRI<span class="elsevierStyleInf">nonevents</span> and quantifies the correctness of upward and downward reclassification or movement of predicted probabilities as a result of using a different risk score.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0100"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> IDI is a measure of the improvement in prediction and may be viewed as the difference between improvement in average sensitivity and average 1-specificity.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0100"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a></p><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 21, Armonk, NY) was used for all statistical analyses. Model comparisons were made using the R Project for Statistical Computing open source programming language.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0105"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7–9</span></a> All statistical tests were two-sided with a value of 0.05 for statistical significance.</p></span></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0080">Results</span><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A total of 2148 patients were included in the present study. Baseline characteristics are detailed in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>. Risk factors and previous cardiovascular disease distribution were similar to other studies and ACS registries. There was a predominance of STEMI. Treatment and outcome are presented in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0010">Table 2</a>. There were 96 in-hospital deaths (4.5%) in the study sample.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0010"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The MCRS showed adequate goodness of fit (p=0.337) and discriminative accuracy (AUC 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81–0.90) (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Figure 1</a>). Calibration was also good, except for patients with high scores, in whom predicted mortality was lower than that observed (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Figure 2</a>). The NCDR risk score also presented adequate goodness of fit (p=0.474) and good discrimination (AUC 0.87, 95% CI 0.83–0.91). Calibration was almost perfect. Finally, the GRACE risk score also showed adequate goodness of fit (p=0.482) and the highest discriminative ability (AUC 0.94, 95% 0.91–0.96) with excellent calibration. Comparing the GRACE risk score with the other scores, GRACE enabled significantly better reclassification of patients in their risk class, with a NRI >75% (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#tbl0015">Tables 3 and 4</a>). Pseudo R-squared statistics confirmed that GRACE is the best predictive risk score: GRACE R<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>=0.497; NCDR R<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>=0.337; MCRS R<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>=0.339.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0005"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0010"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0015"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0020"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0085">Discussion</span><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Risk stratification is an important step in the management of ACS patients, who are a heterogeneous group in term of characteristics and risk, particularly the subgroup with non-ST-elevation ACS. It is thus essential to perform early risk stratification to optimize decision-making for appropriate management of these patients, including the best time for revascularization and the ideal combination of antithrombotic therapies. Although these treatments improve outcome, they can increase both complications and costs. For this reason, informed decisions are important, and for this risk scores are helpful tools.</p><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Several risk stratification scores for ACS have been published since the 1990s. The first was the TIMI risk scores for STEMI and unstable angina/non-STEMI.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0120"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10,11</span></a> These were developed from cohorts of patients included in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The later PURSUIT risk score was also based on an RCT, which can limit its application and use because real-world cohorts have different characteristics.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">12</span></a> The GRACE risk score<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0075"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> was published in 2003, based on the GRACE multicenter ACS registry database that included the whole spectrum of ACS, reflecting a real-world cohort of patients. Due to its high predictive accuracy it is nowadays the most widely used risk score in ACS.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0135"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a></p><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">More recently, both the Mayo Clinic and the National Cardiovascular Data Registry developed risk scores for patients undergoing coronary angioplasty.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0080"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,3</span></a> Both scores included patients with ACS. Although these US scores were developed from PCI registries, the variables selected were mainly clinical in nature; no angiographic data was used for risk scoring. Thus, the variables selected for these new risk scores are very similar to those used in the GRACE risk score. Both scores have been validated in US populations,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0140"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a> but not in European populations, particularly in the context of ACS, and so we sought to validate both risk scores and to compare them with the classical GRACE risk score.</p><p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">All the scores showed moderate predictive accuracy for in-hospital all-cause mortality. However, the GRACE score had the best performance, with significantly better discriminative accuracy as shown by ROC curve analysis. Since ROC curve analysis is considered insufficient to compare different prediction models, it is recommended to perform a reclassification study of one model compared to another. Patient reclassification was better for GRACE according to their observed risk, that is, patients with events were more often correctly reclassified to a higher risk level and patients without events to a lower risk level.</p><p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">There are several possible explanations for these results. Firstly, the US scores were not developed from cohorts of patients with ACS but from larger registries of patients undergoing PCI. In these study groups, only 25–40% of the patients had ACS.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0080"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2,3,14</span></a> This explains several different clinical characteristics of the patients in both US registries compared to our population of patients with ACS: our population has fewer females, fewer diabetic patients and less previous history of myocardial infarction, PCI, peripheral arterial disease and cerebrovascular disease. There was also a significant proportion of patients with STEMI, which is also an important difference compared to other cohorts of ACS patients. In addition, the scores were developed for medium-term mortality (30-day and 1-year) and we validated them for short-term mortality (in-hospital).</p></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0090">Limitations</span><p id="par0115" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Our study has some limitations. Although our study population was obtained from a clinical registry as for the Mayo Clinic, NCDR and GRACE risk scores, the observational and non-randomized nature of the study might limit our conclusions, particularly for other European cohorts with different characteristics. Only patients undergoing PCI were included in the study cohort. Thus our results do not apply to ACS patients who were not revascularized. Furthermore, our study population is somewhat different from other cohorts, particularly its predominance of STEMI patients (70.9%), and thus our results cannot be directly extrapolated to other cohorts.</p></span><span id="sec0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0095">Conclusions</span><p id="par0120" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In a large European cohort of patients with ACS, the NCDR score and the MCRS are useful for in-hospital mortality risk stratification in patients undergoing PCI. However, the GRACE risk score has the best predictive accuracy and as such it should remain the preferred risk stratification score.</p></span><span id="sec0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0100">Conflicts of interest</span><p id="par0125" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:12 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres604846" "titulo" => "Abstract" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Methods" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Conclusion" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec618950" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres604845" "titulo" => "Resumo" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Introdução" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Métodos" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Conclusão" ] ] ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec618951" "titulo" => "Palavras-chave" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Methods" "secciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Statistical analysis" ] ] ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Results" ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Discussion" ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0030" "titulo" => "Limitations" ] 9 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0035" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] 10 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0040" "titulo" => "Conflicts of interest" ] 11 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2015-05-04" "fechaAceptado" => "2015-09-13" "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec618950" "palabras" => array:4 [ 0 => "Risk stratification" 1 => "Scores" 2 => "Acute coronary syndromes" 3 => "Coronary angioplasty" ] ] ] "pt" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palavras-chave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec618951" "palabras" => array:4 [ 0 => "Estratificação de risco" 1 => "<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Scores</span>" 2 => "Síndromes coronárias agudas" 3 => "Angioplastia coronária" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0010">Introduction</span><p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">New scores have been developed and validated in the US for in-hospital mortality risk stratification in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty: the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) risk score and the Mayo Clinic Risk Score (MCRS). We sought to validate these scores in a European population with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to compare their predictive accuracy with that of the GRACE risk score.</p></span> <span id="abst0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0015">Methods</span><p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">In a single-center ACS registry of patients undergoing coronary angioplasty, we used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), a graphical representation of observed vs. expected mortality, and net reclassification improvement (NRI)/integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) analysis to compare the scores.</p></span> <span id="abst0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0020">Results</span><p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">A total of 2148 consecutive patients were included, mean age 63 years (SD 13), 74% male and 71% with ST-segment elevation ACS. In-hospital mortality was 4.5%. The GRACE score showed the best AUC (0.94, 95% CI 0.91–0.96) compared with NCDR (0.87, 95% CI 0.83–0.91, p=0.0003) and MCRS (0.85, 95% CI 0.81–0.90, p=0.0003). In model calibration analysis, GRACE showed the best predictive power. With GRACE, patients were more often correctly classified than with MCRS (NRI 78.7, 95% CI 59.6–97.7; IDI 0.136, 95% CI 0.073–0.199) or NCDR (NRI 79.2, 95% CI 60.2–98.2; IDI 0.148, 95% CI 0.087–0.209).</p></span> <span id="abst0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0025">Conclusion</span><p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The NCDR and Mayo Clinic risk scores are useful for risk stratification of in-hospital mortality in a European population of patients with ACS undergoing coronary angioplasty. However, the GRACE score is still to be preferred.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Methods" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Conclusion" ] ] ] "pt" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Resumo" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">Introdução</span><p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Foram validados novos <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">scores</span> nos EU para estratificação de risco de mortalidade hospitalar em doentes submetidos a angioplastia coronária: da <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">National Cardiovascular Data Registry</span> (NCDR) e da Mayo Clinic (MC). Procurámos validar estes <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">scores</span> numa população Europeia com Síndrome Coronária Aguda (SCA) e comparar a sua acuidade preditiva com o <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">score</span> de GRACE.</p></span> <span id="abst0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Métodos</span><p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Registo de SCA de um único centro de doentes submetidos a angioplastia coronária. Utilizaram-se as curvas <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Receiver Operating Characteristics</span> (ROC) e a <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Area Under Curve</span> (AUC), a mortalidade observada e esperada e a análise do <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Net Reclassification Index (NRI)/Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI).</span></p></span> <span id="abst0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0045">Resultados</span><p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Foram incluídos 2148 doentes consecutivos. Idade média de 63 (DP 13) anos, 74% do sexo masculino e 71% com SCA com elevação ST. A mortalidade hospitalar foi de 4,5%. O <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">score</span> GRACE foi o que mostrou melhor AUC (0,94, IC 95% 0,91 – 0,96) comparativamente com o NCDR (0,87, IC 95% 0,83 – 0,91, p=0,0003) e o MC (0,85, IC 95% 0,81 – 0,90, p=0,0003). Na análise da calibração, o GRACE mostrou o melhor poder preditivo. Com o <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">score</span> GRACE, os doentes foram mais corretamente classificados comparativamente com o da Mayo Clinic (NRI 78,7, IC 95% 59,6 – 97,7; IDI 0,136, IC 95% 0,073 – 0,199) e NCDR (NRI 79,2, IC 95% 60,2 – 98,2; IDI 0,148, IC 95% 0,087 – 0,209).</p></span> <span id="abst0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0050">Conclusão</span><p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Os <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">scores</span> NCDR e MC são úteis na estratificação de risco para mortalidade hospitalar numa população europeia de doentes com SCA submetidos a angioplastia coronária. Contudo, o <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">score</span> GRACE continua a ser o ideal.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Introdução" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Métodos" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Conclusão" ] ] ] ] "multimedia" => array:6 [ 0 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1322 "Ancho" => 1588 "Tamanyo" => 88127 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Area under the curve for the three models. GRACE: Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score; MCRS: Mayo Clinic risk score; NCDR: National Cardiovascular Data Registry risk score.</p>" ] ] 1 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 776 "Ancho" => 3356 "Tamanyo" => 173760 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Calibration of the three scores (plots of predicted vs. observed probability of death for the three scores). NCDR: National Cardiovascular Data Registry.</p>" ] ] 2 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting; MI: myocardial infarction; PAD: peripheral arterial disease; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; SBP: systolic blood pressure; STEMI: ST-elevation myocardial infarction; TIA: transient ischemic attack.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Overall (n=2148) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Age (years)</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">62 (13) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Male gender (%)</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">74.1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="2" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="2" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Risk factors (%)</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Hypertension \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">62.8 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Hyperlipidemia \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">50.0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Diabetes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">23.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Smoking \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">41.9 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="2" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="2" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Previous history (%)</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MI \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">12.5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PCI \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">9.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>CABG \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PAD \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2.8 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Stroke/TIA \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">4.6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="2" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="2" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Initial presentation</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Heart rate (bpm) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">78 (19) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>SBP (mmHg) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">135 (28) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Killip class >1 (%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">9.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>STEMI (%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">70.9 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Creatinine (mg/dl) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">1.0 (0.6) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab990370.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Baseline characteristics of the study population.</p>" ] ] 3 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "tbl0010" "etiqueta" => "Table 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0070" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">ACEI: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB: angiotensin receptor blocker; CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Overall (n=2148) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="2" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Treatment (%)</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Aspirin \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Clopidogrel \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">97.9 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ACEI/ARB \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">87.9 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Beta-blocker \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">84.5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Statin \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">94.6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>PCI \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">100.0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>CABG \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="2" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="2" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Complications (%)</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Stroke \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">1.1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Mechanical complication \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2.3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Major bleeding \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">1.1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab990367.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Treatment and complications.</p>" ] ] 4 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "tbl0015" "etiqueta" => "Table 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "tabla" => array:3 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0080" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">95% confidence intervals are shown in brackets.</p><p id="spar0085" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">AUC: area under the receiver operator characteristic curve; IDI: integrated discrimination improvement; MCRS: Mayo Clinic risk score; NRI: net reclassification improvement.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="2" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Continuous NRI (%)</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>NRI<span class="elsevierStyleInf">events</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">27.1 (8.3–45.9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>NRI<span class="elsevierStyleInf">nonevents</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">51.6 (48.6–54.6) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>NRI<span class="elsevierStyleInf">total</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">78.7 (59.6–97.7) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="2" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">IDI statistics</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.136 (0.073–0.199) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="2" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">AUC (95% CI)</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>MCRS \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.85 (0.81–0.90) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>GRACE risk score \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.94 (0.91–0.96) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="2" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Difference (p)</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top"><0.001 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Goodness of fit (MCRS)</span><a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.337 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Goodness of fit (GRACE risk score)</span><a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.482 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab990369.png" ] ] ] "notaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "tblfn0005" "etiqueta" => "a" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0005">Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test (p-value).</p>" ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0075" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Statistics for model improvement (comparing GRACE and Mayo Clinic risk scores).</p>" ] ] 5 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "tbl0020" "etiqueta" => "Table 4" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "tabla" => array:3 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0095" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">95% confidence intervals are shown in brackets.</p><p id="spar0100" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">AUC: area under the receiver operator characteristic curve; CI: confidence interval; IDI: integrated discrimination improvement; NCDR: National Cardiovascular Data Registry; NRI: net reclassification improvement.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="2" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Continuous NRI (%)</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>NRI<span class="elsevierStyleInf">events</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">26.0 (7.3–44.8) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>NRI<span class="elsevierStyleInf">nonevents</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">53.2 (50.2–56.1) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>NRI<span class="elsevierStyleInf">total</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">79.2 (60.2–98.2) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="2" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">IDI statistics</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.148 (0.087–0.209) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="2" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">AUC (95% CI)</span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>NCDR risk score \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.87 (0.83–0.91) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>GRACE risk score \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.94 (0.91–0.96) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="table-entry " colspan="2" align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span></td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Difference (p)</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top"><0.001 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Goodness of fit (NCDR risk score)</span><a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.474 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Goodness of fit (GRACE risk score)</span><a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.482 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab990368.png" ] ] ] "notaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "tblfn0010" "etiqueta" => "a" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0010">Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test (p-value).</p>" ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0090" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Statistics for model improvement (comparing GRACE and National Cardiovascular Data Registry risk scores).</p>" ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0005" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:14 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0075" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Predictors of hospital mortality in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "C.B. Granger" 1 => "R.J. Goldberg" 2 => "O. Dabbous" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1001/archinte.163.19.2345" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arch Intern Med" "fecha" => "2003" "volumen" => "163" "paginaInicial" => "2345" "paginaFinal" => "2353" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14581255" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0080" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention. Results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "colaboracion" => "on behalf of the NCDR Registry Participants" "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "E.D. Peterson" 1 => "D. Dai" 2 => "E.R. DeLong" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.005" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Coll Cardiol" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "55" "paginaInicial" => "1923" "paginaFinal" => "1932" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20430263" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0085" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Bedside estimates of risk from percutaneous coronary interventions: the new Mayo Clinic risk scores" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M. Singh" 1 => "C.S. Rihal" 2 => "R.J. Lennon" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.4065/82.6.701" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Mayo Clin Proc" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "82" "paginaInicial" => "701" "paginaFinal" => "708" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17550750" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0090" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Association of hemoglobin levels with clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndromes" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M.S. Sabatine" 1 => "D.A. Morrow" 2 => "R.P. Giugliano" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1161/01.CIR.0000162477.70955.5F" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Circulation" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "111" "paginaInicial" => "2042" "paginaFinal" => "2049" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15824203" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0095" "etiqueta" => "5" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a non-parametric approach" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "E.R. DeLong" 1 => "D.M. DeLong" 2 => "D.L. Clarke-Pearson" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Biometrics" "fecha" => "1988" "volumen" => "44" "paginaInicial" => "837" "paginaFinal" => "845" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3203132" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0959289X1000004X" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "0959289X" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0100" "etiqueta" => "6" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M.J. Pencina" 1 => "R.B. D’Agostino" 2 => "E.W. Steyerberg" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1002/sim.4085" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Stat Med" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "30" "paginaInicial" => "11" "paginaFinal" => "21" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21204120" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0105" "etiqueta" => "7" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "R: a language and environment for statistical computing" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "R Development Core Team" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:2 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:4 [ "isbn" => "3900051070" "fecha" => "2008" "editorial" => "R Foundation for Statistical Computing" "editorialLocalizacion" => "Vienna, Austria" ] ] 1 => array:1 [ "WWW" => array:1 [ "link" => "http://www.R-project.org" ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0110" "etiqueta" => "8" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "PredictABLE: an R package for the assessment of risk prediction models" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "S. Kundu" 1 => "Y.S. Aulchencko" 2 => "C.M. van Duijn" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s10654-011-9567-4" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur J Epidemiol" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "26" "paginaInicial" => "261" "paginaFinal" => "264" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21431839" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0115" "etiqueta" => "9" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "X. Robin" 1 => "N. Turck" 2 => "A. Hainard" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:4 [ "tituloSerie" => "BMC Biometrics" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "12" "paginaInicial" => "77" ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0120" "etiqueta" => "10" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation myocardial MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "E.M. Antman" 1 => "M. Cohen" 2 => "P.J.L.M. Bernik" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "JAMA" "fecha" => "2000" "volumen" => "284" "paginaInicial" => "835" "paginaFinal" => "842" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10938172" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0125" "etiqueta" => "11" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "TIMI risk score for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a convenient, bedside, clinical score for risk assessment at presentation: an intravenous nPA for treatment of infarcting myocardium early II trial substudy" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "D.A. Morrow" 1 => "E.M. Antman" 2 => "A. Charlesworth" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Circulation" "fecha" => "2000" "volumen" => "102" "paginaInicial" => "2031" "paginaFinal" => "2037" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11044416" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0130" "etiqueta" => "12" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Predictors of outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation. Results from an international trial of 9461 patients" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "colaboracion" => "for the PURSUIT Investigators" "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "E. Boersma" 1 => "K.S. Pieper" 2 => "E.W. Steyerberg" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Circulation" "fecha" => "2000" "volumen" => "101" "paginaInicial" => "2557" "paginaFinal" => "2567" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10840005" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0135" "etiqueta" => "13" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores: sustained prognostic value and interaction with revascularization in NSTE-ACS" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "P. de Araujo Gonçalves" 1 => "J. Ferreira" 2 => "C. Aguiar" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1093/eurheartj/ehi187" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur Heart J" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "26" "paginaInicial" => "865" "paginaFinal" => "872" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15764619" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0140" "etiqueta" => "14" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Validation of the Mayo Clinic risk score for in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary interventions using the National Cardiovascular Data Registry" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M. Singh" 1 => "E.D. Peterson" 2 => "S. Milford-Beland" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Circ Cardiovasc Intervent" "fecha" => "2008" "volumen" => "1" "paginaInicial" => "36" "paginaFinal" => "44" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/08702551/0000003500000002/v1_201602130045/S0870255115003637/v1_201602130045/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "358" "tipo" => "SECCION" "pt" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Artigos originais" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "pt" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/08702551/0000003500000002/v1_201602130045/S0870255115003637/v1_201602130045/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00004E&text.app=https://revportcardiol.org/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0870255115003637?idApp=UINPBA00004E" ]
Ano/Mês | Html | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
2024 Novembro | 7 | 3 | 10 |
2024 Outubro | 35 | 28 | 63 |
2024 Setembro | 53 | 22 | 75 |
2024 Agosto | 47 | 28 | 75 |
2024 Julho | 35 | 28 | 63 |
2024 Junho | 35 | 37 | 72 |
2024 Maio | 41 | 28 | 69 |
2024 Abril | 45 | 27 | 72 |
2024 Maro | 35 | 21 | 56 |
2024 Fevereiro | 29 | 20 | 49 |
2024 Janeiro | 27 | 20 | 47 |
2023 Dezembro | 29 | 18 | 47 |
2023 Novembro | 41 | 37 | 78 |
2023 Outubro | 19 | 13 | 32 |
2023 Setembro | 18 | 16 | 34 |
2023 Agosto | 37 | 24 | 61 |
2023 Julho | 22 | 8 | 30 |
2023 Junho | 31 | 10 | 41 |
2023 Maio | 46 | 23 | 69 |
2023 Abril | 13 | 5 | 18 |
2023 Maro | 28 | 18 | 46 |
2023 Fevereiro | 36 | 21 | 57 |
2023 Janeiro | 27 | 12 | 39 |
2022 Dezembro | 38 | 23 | 61 |
2022 Novembro | 35 | 23 | 58 |
2022 Outubro | 30 | 22 | 52 |
2022 Setembro | 30 | 29 | 59 |
2022 Agosto | 28 | 40 | 68 |
2022 Julho | 37 | 31 | 68 |
2022 Junho | 31 | 35 | 66 |
2022 Maio | 34 | 32 | 66 |
2022 Abril | 43 | 29 | 72 |
2022 Maro | 33 | 35 | 68 |
2022 Fevereiro | 24 | 29 | 53 |
2022 Janeiro | 43 | 27 | 70 |
2021 Dezembro | 25 | 22 | 47 |
2021 Novembro | 38 | 49 | 87 |
2021 Outubro | 49 | 41 | 90 |
2021 Setembro | 22 | 32 | 54 |
2021 Agosto | 42 | 38 | 80 |
2021 Julho | 21 | 25 | 46 |
2021 Junho | 25 | 12 | 37 |
2021 Maio | 27 | 31 | 58 |
2021 Abril | 29 | 27 | 56 |
2021 Maro | 56 | 14 | 70 |
2021 Fevereiro | 60 | 12 | 72 |
2021 Janeiro | 39 | 10 | 49 |
2020 Dezembro | 35 | 15 | 50 |
2020 Novembro | 29 | 17 | 46 |
2020 Outubro | 32 | 20 | 52 |
2020 Setembro | 40 | 15 | 55 |
2020 Agosto | 22 | 12 | 34 |
2020 Julho | 35 | 19 | 54 |
2020 Junho | 35 | 8 | 43 |
2020 Maio | 34 | 12 | 46 |
2020 Abril | 37 | 14 | 51 |
2020 Maro | 43 | 12 | 55 |
2020 Fevereiro | 52 | 76 | 128 |
2020 Janeiro | 25 | 5 | 30 |
2019 Dezembro | 23 | 3 | 26 |
2019 Novembro | 28 | 7 | 35 |
2019 Outubro | 29 | 9 | 38 |
2019 Setembro | 22 | 8 | 30 |
2019 Agosto | 23 | 10 | 33 |
2019 Julho | 34 | 9 | 43 |
2019 Junho | 29 | 3 | 32 |
2019 Maio | 42 | 11 | 53 |
2019 Abril | 21 | 12 | 33 |
2019 Maro | 31 | 9 | 40 |
2019 Fevereiro | 38 | 10 | 48 |
2019 Janeiro | 36 | 7 | 43 |
2018 Dezembro | 39 | 11 | 50 |
2018 Novembro | 88 | 13 | 101 |
2018 Outubro | 201 | 26 | 227 |
2018 Setembro | 42 | 19 | 61 |
2018 Agosto | 24 | 14 | 38 |
2018 Julho | 20 | 4 | 24 |
2018 Junho | 28 | 6 | 34 |
2018 Maio | 34 | 14 | 48 |
2018 Abril | 27 | 19 | 46 |
2018 Maro | 48 | 10 | 58 |
2018 Fevereiro | 23 | 4 | 27 |
2018 Janeiro | 25 | 9 | 34 |
2017 Dezembro | 36 | 11 | 47 |
2017 Novembro | 32 | 18 | 50 |
2017 Outubro | 24 | 8 | 32 |
2017 Setembro | 19 | 3 | 22 |
2017 Agosto | 31 | 8 | 39 |
2017 Julho | 17 | 10 | 27 |
2017 Junho | 23 | 10 | 33 |
2017 Maio | 32 | 19 | 51 |
2017 Abril | 27 | 4 | 31 |
2017 Maro | 15 | 7 | 22 |
2017 Fevereiro | 35 | 9 | 44 |
2017 Janeiro | 33 | 10 | 43 |
2016 Dezembro | 29 | 10 | 39 |
2016 Novembro | 16 | 16 | 32 |
2016 Outubro | 16 | 14 | 30 |
2016 Setembro | 18 | 8 | 26 |
2016 Agosto | 15 | 6 | 21 |
2016 Julho | 12 | 7 | 19 |
2016 Junho | 2 | 11 | 13 |
2016 Maio | 9 | 0 | 9 |
2016 Abril | 28 | 3 | 31 |
2016 Maro | 51 | 39 | 90 |
2016 Fevereiro | 88 | 68 | 156 |