Informação da revista
Vol. 39. Núm. 6.
Páginas 359-360 (Junho 2020)
Partilhar
Partilhar
Baixar PDF
Mais opções do artigo
Vol. 39. Núm. 6.
Páginas 359-360 (Junho 2020)
Letter to the Editor
Open Access
Assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction: An integral part of risk-stratification in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy - A response
Avaliação da disfunção coronária microvascular: uma parte integrante da estratificação de risco na miocardiopatia de Takotsubo. Resposta
Visitas
...
Jeremias Bayóna,
Autor para correspondência
jerebayon@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Alejandro Gutierrez-Barriosb, Carlos Gonzalez-Juanateya
a Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Galicia, Spain
b Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain
Conteúdo relacionado
Kenan Yalta, Muhammet Gurdogan, Gokay Taylan
Informação do artigo
Texto Completo
Bibliografia
Baixar PDF
Estatísticas
Texto Completo
Dear Editor,

We have read the article by Yalta et al. on the subject of our previously published clinical case of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC)1 and we would like to highlight several important points:

Firstly, coronary slow flow (CSF) and TIMI frame count (TFC) must be analyzed with caution, despite their role as a marker of enhanced coronary microvascular resistance and its association with ischemia, arrhythmia, heart failure and even mortality.2 CSF is affected by the patient's clinical features: adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation rate, smoking status, total cholesterol, hematocrit, fasting blood glucose, red cell distribution width etc.3,4 Moreover, technical and physiological variables may have an impact on TFC, including injection force, nitrate administration, dye injection at the beginning of diastole or heart rate.5

Currently, hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR) and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) are the gold standard for invasive assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Recent European guidelines highlight not only the role of HMR/IMR, but also coronary flow reserve (CFR), and recommend that CMD should be diagnosed by measuring CFR or minimal microcirculatory resistance (HMR or IMR).6 This is why we considered physiological coronary flow studies to be more precise than CSF or TFC.

Secondly, a recently published paper reported the case of eight consecutive patients diagnosed with TTC, in whom the invasive physiological assessment of microcirculation in the left anterior descending coronary artery was obtained using a pressure-temperature sensor-equipped wire.7 Most patients had normal or borderline IMR values, however, CFR was reduced in all but two patients. This was similar to the findings of our published report. There is a lack of evidence supporting the role of invasive CFR or IMR/HMR in predicting outcome or recurrence in TTC, but the role of these indices has been clearly linked to prognosis in many other scenarios, including in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.8

Thirdly, CMD in TTC is time-dependent and microvascular damage with temporal evolution toward resolution might closely correlate with myocardial stunning recovery. In our case, catheterization was performed early and consequently, both CFR and HMR were profoundly affected, revealing severe, but probably transient microvascular dysfunction.

Our patient was treated with beta-blockers and nitroglycerin (as coronary vasodilators) to reduce left ventricular filling pressure and afterload in the absence of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction.9 Nevertheless, we agree with Yalta et al. that the physiological assessment of coronary blood flow will lead us to a better understanding of TTC, enabling us to choose the correct medical treatment or even prevent recurrence. We still, however, have a long way to go until this happens.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References
[1]
J. Bayon, M. Santás-Alvarez, R. Ocaranza-Sánchez, et al.
Assessment with intracoronary pressure and flow guidewire, at baseline and after intracoronary adenosine infusion, in a patient with Takotsubo syndrome.
Rev Port Cardiol, 38 (2019), pp. 829
[2]
K. Yalta, M. Yilmaztepe, F. Ucar, et al.
Coronary slow flow in the setting of Tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy: a causative factor? An innocent bystander?. Or a prognostic sign?.
Int J Cardiol, 198 (2015), pp. 229-231
[3]
Y. Li, Y. Wang, D. Jia, et al.
Assessment of risk factors and left ventricular function in patients with slow coronary flow.
Heart Vessels, 31 (2016), pp. 288-297
[4]
Ghaffari S1, Tajlil A1, N. Aslanabadi, et al.
Clinical and laboratory predictors of coronary slow flow in coronary angiography.
Perfusion, 32 (2017), pp. 13-19
[5]
A. Abaci, A. Oguzhan, N.K. Eryol, et al.
Effect of potential confounding factors on the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial frame count and its reproducibility.
Circulation, 100 (1999), pp. 2219-2223
[6]
J. Knuuti, W. Wijns, A. Saraste, et al.
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.
Eur Heart J, 41 (2020), pp. 407-477
[7]
Fearon WF1, A.F. Low, A.S. Yong, et al.
Prognostic value of the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance measured after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Circulation, 127 (2013), pp. 2436-2441
[8]
A. Gutiérrez-Barrios, F. Rivero, I. Noval-Morillas, et al.
Feasibility of absolute coronary blood flow and microvascular resistance quantification in Tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy.
Rev Esp Cardiol, 73 (2020), pp. 94-95
[9]
J.R. Ghadri, I.S. Wittstein, A. Prasad, et al.
International Expert Consensus Document on Takotsubo Syndrome (Part II): Diagnostic Workup, Outcome, and Management.
Eur Heart J, 39 (2018), pp. 2047-2062
Copyright © 2020. Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia
Idiomas
Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia

Receba a nossa Newsletter

Opções de artigo
Ferramentas
en pt

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

Ao assinalar que é «Profissional de Saúde», declara conhecer e aceitar que a responsável pelo tratamento dos dados pessoais dos utilizadores da página de internet da Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (RPC), é esta entidade, com sede no Campo Grande, n.º 28, 13.º, 1700-093 Lisboa, com os telefones 217 970 685 e 217 817 630, fax 217 931 095 e com o endereço de correio eletrónico revista@spc.pt. Declaro para todos os fins, que assumo inteira responsabilidade pela veracidade e exatidão da afirmação aqui fornecida.