Journal Information
Vol. 40. Issue 2.
Pages 141.e1-141.e4 (February 2021)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
...
Vol. 40. Issue 2.
Pages 141.e1-141.e4 (February 2021)
Case report
DOI: 10.1016/j.repce.2019.07.010
Open Access
Left ventricular pacing with a temporary pacemaker: Case report
Pacing ventricular esquerdo com pacemaker temporário: relato de caso
Visits
...
Marta Tavares-Silvaa,b,?
Corresponding author
martartsilva@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Carla de Sousaa, Vítor Araújoa, Luís Adãoa, Gonçalo Pestanaa, Roberto Pintoa, Filipe Macedoa,b, Maria Júlia Maciela
a Department of Cardiology, Centro Hospitalar São João, EPE, Porto, Portugal
b Department of Surgery and Physiology, Cardiovascular Research & Development Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Portugal
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (4)
Show moreShow less
Abstract

We report a case of temporary pacemaker lead malposition in the left ventricle crossing the interventricular septum (IVS). The majority of described cases occur due to a patent foramen ovale and are frequently incidental findings. A course across the IVS is rarely found and this complication with temporary leads is not even reported in the literature. This very rare location entails a risk of dangerous complications associated with left-to-right flow after lead removal. Echocardiography was an essential tool to diagnose the lead's course inside the heart and enabled secure removal of the lead with cardiac surgery backup.

Keywords:
Pacemaker complications
Pacemaker lead malposition
Fluoroscopy
Echocardiography
Resumo

Reportamos um caso de mau posicionamento de sonda de pacemaker temporário no ventrículo esquerdo com trajeto através do septo interventricular. A maioria dos casos descritos ocorre devido à existência de um foramen ovale patente e são frequentemente achados incidentais. O trajeto através do septo interventricular é raramente encontrado e esta complicação com sondas temporárias não está sequer descrita na literatura. Esta localização muito rara comporta um risco de complicações graves associadas a um fluxo esquerdo-direito após a remoção da sonda. A ecocardiografia foi uma ferramenta essencial para o diagnóstico do trajeto da sonda dentro do coração e permitiu a sua remoção de forma segura com backup de cirurgia cardíaca.

Palavras-chave:
Complicações de pacemaker
Mau posicionamento de sonda de pacemaker
Fluoroscopia
Ecocardiografia
Full Text
Case report

A 49-year-old male was admitted to the emergency department of our hospital during the night after two episodes of syncope in the previous two hours. The electrocardiogram (ECG) revealed advanced atrioventricular block with 3:1 conduction and heart rate of 35 bpm. Atropine was administered without chronotropic response. Blood tests were normal, with the exception of alcoholemia, which was 1.64 g/l. Meanwhile, reversion to sinus rhythm with bifascicular block (right bundle branch block and left posterior fascicular block) was documented. Given the risk of a new episode of syncope, a temporary pacemaker (PM) was implanted through the right femoral vein. The procedure was simple and uneventful, with lead position displaced slightly upward, but with good ventricular capture and low capture threshold.

The patient remained monitored with telemetry, in sinus rhythm and asymptomatic until the next morning, when temporary pacing periods were detected. The ECG showed a paced right bundle branch block pattern (Figure 1), which raised the suspicion of an inappropriate lead position. Bedside echocardiography documented an anomalous course of the lead across the muscular portion of the intraventricular septum, with the tip in the left ventricle (LV) (Figure 2). There was no pericardial effusion and no shunt was detected with color Doppler. Biventricular systolic function was preserved.

Figure 1.

Electrocardiogram showing a paced right bundle branch block pattern.

(0.96MB).
Figure 2.

Echocardiogram showing the lead crossing the inferior vena cava and right atrium (A), and its anomalous course across the muscular portion of the intraventricular septum, with the tip in the left ventricle (B and C). No shunt was detected between the right and left ventricles (D).

(0.33MB).

After discussion in the heart team, it was decided to first protect the patient from bradycardia by implanting a permanent PM and then to carefully remove the malpositioned lead. A dual-chamber permanent PM was implanted through the subclavian vein, with no complications. The course of the temporary lead could be visualized on fluoroscopy across the inferior vena cava and the heart, with the tip in the LV (Figure 3). The left ventricular lead was removed under the surveillance of a cardiac surgeon, the patient remaining hemodynamically stable and without complications.

Figure 3.

Fluoroscopy, posteroanterior view, showing malposition of the temporary pacemaker lead, with the tip in the left ventricle, and normally positioned right atrial and right ventricular leads of the permanent pacemaker.

(0.28MB).

At the end of the procedure, echocardiography confirmed the position of the PM leads in the right chambers, without pericardial effusion. After administration of agitated saline, no shunt was detected between right and left chambers (Figure 4). The patient progressed favorably, remained asymptomatic and was discharged from the hospital the next day. After three months he attended the pacemaker clinic and reported no related symptoms.

Figure 4.

Post-procedure echocardiogram, subcostal view, revealing a well-positioned permanent pacemaker lead (A); no shunt was detected between the right and left chambers (B).

(0.18MB).
Discussion

Malposition of permanent pacemaker or cardiac defibrillator ventricular leads is a rare complication of pacemaker implantation.1 It may be overlooked by routine pacemaker interrogation and is frequently an incidental finding in asymptomatic patients. It is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events, and most patients are treated with lifelong anticoagulation, especially if the lead has been placed for a long time. However, if the diagnosis is made shortly after implantation, the lead should be removed percutaneously. Different locations have been described, including the LV. Lead displacement in the LV occurs most often due to a patent foramen ovale, whereas IVS perforation or crossing an interventricular septal defect are much rarer. Diagnosis and management can be very challenging. A right bundle branch block pattern on a 12-lead surface ECG is an important clue to the diagnosis, and should immediately raise the suspicion of displacement.2 Fluoroscopy is the mainstay imaging modality to guide lead placement, but echocardiography may be of value to detect a malpositioned lead, enabling location of the lead's course inside the heart. Although rare, this complication should be kept in mind, in order to enable early recognition and treatment and to avoid possible late complications such as thromboembolic events or endocarditis.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References
[1]
M.A. Ohlow, M. Roos, B. Lauer, et al.
Incidence, predictors, and outcome of inadvertent malposition of transvenous pacing or defibrillation lead in the left heart.
Europace, 18 (2016), pp. 1049-1054
[2]
G. Goldenberg, Z. Iakobishvili, B. Strasberg.
Electrocardiographic algorithm for the diagnosis of inadvertent implantation of permanent pacemaker lead in the left ventricular cavity.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol, 18 (2013), pp. 294-296
Copyright © 2020. Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia
Idiomas
Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools
en pt

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

By checking that you are a health professional, you are stating that you are aware and accept that the Portuguese Journal of Cardiology (RPC) is the Data Controller that processes the personal information of users of its website, with its registered office at Campo Grande, n.º 28, 13.º, 1700-093 Lisbon, telephone 217 970 685 and 217 817 630, fax 217 931 095, and email revista@spc.pt. I declare for all purposes that the information provided herein is accurate and correct.