Journal Information
Vol. 38. Issue 8.
Pages 557 (August 2019)
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 38. Issue 8.
Pages 557 (August 2019)
Editorial comment
Open Access
Information and knowledge
Informação e conhecimento
Vítor Rodrigues
Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Related content
Ana Paula Rodrigues, Vânia Gaio, Irina Kislaya, Sidsel Graff-Iversen, Eugénio Cordeiro, Ana Clara Silva, Sónia Namorado, Marta Barreto, Ana Paula Gil, Liliana Antunes, Ana Santos, José Pereira Miguel, Baltazar Nunes, Carlos Matias Dias
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Full Text

This issue of the Journal sees the publication of a study by Rodrigues et al.1 that aims to quantify the prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension and associated sociodemographic disparities in Portugal. The study is of considerable importance for the quantitative knowledge of this condition, an important risk factor in the etiology of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease.

Without adequate quantitative knowledge of the actual situation regarding a particular condition, it is very difficult to establish preventive strategies, whether primary, secondary or tertiary. But without subsequent monitoring and assessment, the effectiveness of these preventive strategies cannot be measured, which hinders informed decisions on whether they should be maintained, modified or discontinued.

At the same time, such studies should be carefully designed, implemented, and assessed using subgroups in order to analyze smaller elements of the overall population, focusing on those with higher or lower prevalence and/or risk.

Studies designed in this way enable comparisons to be drawn between regions, by taking into account the inevitable differences in structural and process indicators and thereby avoiding bias in the definition of outcome indicators. But the high non-response rate that is usually found in population surveys must be taken into account and analyzed, preferably quantitatively, since this may be a major source of bias by introducing random systematic variability, due to self-selection in population response. The selection of criteria of positivity for the condition under study will also have an important effect.

Finally, it is becoming increasingly clear to both the general population and to the medical community that a vertical approach to the natural history of disease (risk factors leading to disease) is inadequate, and that causality is better seen as horizontal, with multiple factors and multiple comorbidities increasingly being integrated into health programs aimed at different levels of prevention. Future research should take this concept into account and longitudinal cohort studies, although more difficult to implement, should be the preferred approach. This will be a step forward in observational research into the natural history of disease.

Conflicts of interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

A.P. Rodrigues, V. Gaio, I. Kislaya, et al.
Sociodemographic disparities in hypertension prevalence: results from the first Portuguese National Health Examination Survey.
Rev Port Cardiol, 38 (2019), pp. 547-555
Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
en pt

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

By checking that you are a health professional, you are stating that you are aware and accept that the Portuguese Journal of Cardiology (RPC) is the Data Controller that processes the personal information of users of its website, with its registered office at Campo Grande, n.º 28, 13.º, 1700-093 Lisbon, telephone 217 970 685 and 217 817 630, fax 217 931 095, and email I declare for all purposes that the information provided herein is accurate and correct.