was read the article
array:25 [ "pii" => "S2174204917300545" "issn" => "21742049" "doi" => "10.1016/j.repce.2016.09.007" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2017-04-01" "aid" => "935" "copyright" => "Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia" "copyrightAnyo" => "2016" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "ssu" "cita" => "Rev Port Cardiol. 2017;36:287-305" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 5143 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 184 "HTML" => 3585 "PDF" => 1374 ] ] "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "pt" => array:20 [ "pii" => "S0870255116303870" "issn" => "08702551" "doi" => "10.1016/j.repc.2016.09.010" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2017-04-01" "aid" => "935" "copyright" => "Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "ssu" "cita" => "Rev Port Cardiol. 2017;36:287-305" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 6847 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 215 "HTML" => 5779 "PDF" => 853 ] ] "pt" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Artigo de revisão</span>" "titulo" => "Estenose aórtica paradoxal – revisão sistemática" "tienePdf" => "pt" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "pt" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "pt" 1 => "en" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "287" "paginaFinal" => "305" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Paradoxical aortic stenosis: A systematic review" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "pt" => true "en" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "pt" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "pt" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figura 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1532 "Ancho" => 2212 "Tamanyo" => 213773 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "pt" => "<p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Workflow</span>.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Rita Cavaca, Rogério Teixeira, Maria João Vieira, Lino Gonçalves" "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Rita" "apellidos" => "Cavaca" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Rogério" "apellidos" => "Teixeira" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Maria João" "apellidos" => "Vieira" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Lino" "apellidos" => "Gonçalves" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "pt" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S2174204917300545" "doi" => "10.1016/j.repce.2016.09.007" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2174204917300545?idApp=UINPBA00004E" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0870255116303870?idApp=UINPBA00004E" "url" => "/08702551/0000003600000004/v1_201704060057/S0870255116303870/v1_201704060057/pt/main.assets" ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:18 [ "pii" => "S2174204917300922" "issn" => "21742049" "doi" => "10.1016/j.repce.2016.03.014" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2017-04-01" "aid" => "978" "documento" => "simple-article" "crossmark" => 1 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "crp" "cita" => "Rev Port Cardiol. 2017;36:307.e1-5" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 3209 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 174 "HTML" => 2681 "PDF" => 354 ] ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Case report</span>" "titulo" => "Pericardial mesothelioma presenting as a suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "pt" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "307.e1" "paginaFinal" => "307.e5" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "pt" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Apresentação de mesotelioma do pericárdio como suspeita de enfarte agudo do miocárdio com elevação de ST" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "pt" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0015" "etiqueta" => "Figure 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr3.jpeg" "Alto" => 1218 "Ancho" => 1625 "Tamanyo" => 249478 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Intraoperative photograph of the tumor.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Ana Sofia Barroso, Sérgio Leite, Fernando Friões, Mariana Vasconcelos, Daniela Azevedo, Helena Baldaia, Mário Jorge Amorim, Paula Dias" "autores" => array:8 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Ana Sofia" "apellidos" => "Barroso" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Sérgio" "apellidos" => "Leite" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Fernando" "apellidos" => "Friões" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Mariana" "apellidos" => "Vasconcelos" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Daniela" "apellidos" => "Azevedo" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Helena" "apellidos" => "Baldaia" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Mário Jorge" "apellidos" => "Amorim" ] 7 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Paula" "apellidos" => "Dias" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2174204917300922?idApp=UINPBA00004E" "url" => "/21742049/0000003600000004/v1_201704230025/S2174204917300922/v1_201704230025/en/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:20 [ "pii" => "S2174204917300570" "issn" => "21742049" "doi" => "10.1016/j.repce.2017.03.003" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2017-04-01" "aid" => "974" "copyright" => "Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia" "documento" => "simple-article" "crossmark" => 1 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "dis" "cita" => "Rev Port Cardiol. 2017;36:283-5" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 3738 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 188 "HTML" => 3124 "PDF" => 426 ] ] "en" => array:10 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Editorial comment</span>" "titulo" => "The global burden of disease: An information resource for policy-making and evaluation of health interventions" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "283" "paginaFinal" => "285" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "pt" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "A carga global de doença: fonte de informação para a definição de políticas e avaliação de intervenções em saúde" ] ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Evangelista Rocha" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Evangelista" "apellidos" => "Rocha" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "pt" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S0870255117301439" "doi" => "10.1016/j.repc.2017.02.007" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "pt" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0870255117301439?idApp=UINPBA00004E" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2174204917300570?idApp=UINPBA00004E" "url" => "/21742049/0000003600000004/v1_201704230025/S2174204917300570/v1_201704230025/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:22 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Review article</span>" "titulo" => "Paradoxical aortic stenosis: A systematic review" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "287" "paginaFinal" => "305" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "Rita Cavaca, Rogério Teixeira, Maria João Vieira, Lino Gonçalves" "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Rita" "apellidos" => "Cavaca" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "Rogério" "apellidos" => "Teixeira" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "rogeriopteixeira@gmail.com" ] "referencia" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] 2 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Maria João" "apellidos" => "Vieira" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span>" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Lino" "apellidos" => "Gonçalves" "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal" "etiqueta" => "a" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Serviço de Cardiologia, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra – Hospital Geral, Coimbra, Portugal" "etiqueta" => "b" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] 2 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital de Santarém, Santarém, Portugal" "etiqueta" => "c" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "pt" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Estenose aórtica paradoxal – revisão sistemática" ] ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1542 "Ancho" => 2215 "Tamanyo" => 211315 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Flowchart of the study design.</p>" ] ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0030">Introduction</span><p id="par0130" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valve disease in Europe, and is most often due to degenerative etiology.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0290"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> It is estimated to affect 2-7% of the population aged over 65 years.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0295"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> Degenerative AS progresses slowly and is associated with various clinical manifestations including angina, syncope, cardiac rhythm disturbances, heart failure and sudden death.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0290"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a></p><p id="par0135" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">According to the European and American guidelines on valvular disease, severe AS is defined as aortic valve area (AVA) of ≤1 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>, mean pressure gradient (MPG) between aorta and left ventricle of ≥40 mmHg, or peak flow velocity (PFV) of ≥4 m/s, with normal cardiac output.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0290"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1,3</span></a></p><p id="par0140" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the absence of valve replacement, AS evolves to a form of heart failure with left ventricular (LV) dilatation and dysfunction. In this stage there is a reduction in transvalvular gradients, caused by diminished systolic flow through the aortic valve due to impaired LV systolic function. This entity, first described by Carabello et al. in 1980,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0305"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a> is termed low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LF-LG-AS). It is characterized by an AVA of ≤1 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> or indexed AVA (AVAi) of ≤0.6 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>, MPG of <40 mmHg and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤40%. Patients with LF-LG-AS account for only 5-10% of those with severe AS.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0310"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5–7</span></a></p><p id="par0145" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In 2007, Hachicha et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0325"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> described for the first time a form of AS with reduced systolic flow but, paradoxically, preserved LVEF. This new entity, which they termed paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis, was defined as AVA of ≤1 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>, MPG of <40 mmHg, and stroke volume index (SVI) of ≤35 ml/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>, despite LVEF of ≤50%.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0300"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3,5,9</span></a> This entity has been shown to have a significant prevalence and it is thought that it may represent an advanced form of AS.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0325"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8,10</span></a></p><p id="par0150" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The aim of the present article was to perform a systematic review of the literature on paradoxical AS, discussing aspects of definition, clinical characteristics, diagnosis, prognosis, natural history, and treatment.</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">Methods</span><p id="par0155" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A search was carried out in the PubMed database up to December 29, 2014, using the following search terms: “Paradoxical aortic valve stenosis” and one of: “low flow”, “low gradient”, “assessment”, “left ventricular ejection fraction”, “echocardiography”, “treatment”, or “prognosis”. The search covered articles in English published since 2007 and included original articles, clinical trials, reviews and animal trials.</p><p id="par0160" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The filtered search yielded 61 articles, of which 23 were rejected on the basis of the title and abstract as being unrelated to the study aim. A complete reading was performed of the remaining 38, of which 13 were excluded from the present review: six letters to the editor, two case reports and one clinical vignette, one published only as an abstract, two that did not in fact refer to paradoxical AS, and one editorial that was considered irrelevant. In order not to miss any important articles, the reference lists of the selected articles were perused and 32 more publications were added to the original list. The guidelines on valvular disease of the American and European societies of cardiology were also consulted. The final list consisted of 57 articles (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Figure 1</a>).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0165" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The quality of the main studies analyzed in the present review was assessed (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#sec0125">Supplementary Table 1</a>) by an external consultant using the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool (<a href="http://www.ephpp.ca/tools.html">http://www.ephpp.ca/tools.html</a>).</p></span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Results</span><p id="par0170" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The search results produced 14 original articles on paradoxical AS, of which four were retrospective (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0315"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6,8,54,55</span></a>) and seven were prospective (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0340"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11,16,17,22,41,52,53</span></a>). Two substudies of randomized trials (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0530"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">49,51</span></a>) and one of a multicenter registry (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0565"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">56</span></a>) were also included.</p><p id="par0175" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The aim of around a third of the studies was to compare paradoxical AS with the classical AS phenotype (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0315"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6,8,11,22,51</span></a>). One study included a comparison with patients with moderate AS (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0325"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a>) and another with patients with LF-LG-AS (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0545"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">52</span></a>). Two assessed the interaction between transvalvular gradient and SVI in patients with AVA of ≤1 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> and LVEF of ≤50% (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0365"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16,17</span></a>). Six focused on surgical treatment (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0315"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6,8,16,17,22,53</span></a>) and three on percutaneous treatment of patients with paradoxical AS (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0530"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">49,55,56</span></a>). These 14 articles are summarized in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0045">Definition</span><p id="par0180" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Paradoxical AS is defined as AVA of ≤1 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>, MPG of <40 mmHg, and SVI of ≤35 ml/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>, despite LVEF of ≤50% (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Figure 1</a>).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0325"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> This condition is usually the result of marked LV concentric remodeling with interstitial myocardial fibrosis, and reduction of the ventricular chamber and its compliance.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0325"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8,11–15</span></a> There is reduced longitudinal myocardial strain in the phenotype of paradoxical AS despite good global LV systolic function.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0315"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a></p><p id="par0185" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Low systolic flow hampers assessment of the severity of AS, since the gradient is proportional to the fourth power of the flow, and any reduction in flow leads to a large reduction in gradient and hence underestimation of disease severity.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0330"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a> Furthermore, transvalvular flow rate depends not only on ejection volume but also on ejection time.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0380"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> Other factors such as atrial fibrillation (AF), mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis and tricuspid regurgitation can also play an important part in reducing ejection volume and thus contribute to situations of low flow and low gradient.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0320"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7,16</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0050">Clinical characteristics</span><p id="par0190" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Estimates of the prevalence of paradoxical AS range between 3% and 35% of patients with severe degenerative AS (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Figure 2</a>).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0315"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6,7</span></a> This discrepancy may be due to the characteristics of study populations.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0325"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8,16</span></a> For example, in an echocardiographic study of 1704 consecutive patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF (≤50%), Eleid et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0320"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> found a prevalence of paradoxical AS of only 3%, whereas in another echocardiographic study, of 397 patients with AS, Kusunose et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0315"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> documented a prevalence of paradoxical AS of 35%. Another study, on a sample of patients with severe AS referred for cardiac catheterization,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0370"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> observed a prevalence of 26%, a similar figure to echocardiographic studies.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0010"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0195" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Paradoxical AS appears to be more frequent in females and older patients. Compared to classical severe high-gradient AS, more patients with paradoxical AS have a history of hypertension, diabetes, AF and coronary artery disease.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0315"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6,7,9,10,17,18</span></a> Hypertension is common in patients with AS, but blood pressure (BP) in those with paradoxical AS may be pseudonormalized by the low-flow pattern associated with increased vascular stiffness.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0325"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> Its symptomatology is similar to that of classical severe AS, although its onset is more insidious.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0290"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1,10</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0055">Diagnosis of paradoxical aortic stenosis</span><p id="par0200" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">When paradoxical AS is suspected, as well as PFV, aortic transvalvular gradients and AVA, assessment should include vascular load, global LV hemodynamic load, LV function beyond LVEF, LV geometry, and myocardial damage.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0380"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a></p><p id="par0205" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Transthoracic echocardiography is the method of choice for hemodynamic study in AS. Cardiac catheterization is not routinely indicated except when echocardiography is not diagnostic or when there are discrepancies in clinical findings.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0385"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">20,21</span></a></p><span id="sec0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0060">Problems with calculation of aortic valve area</span><p id="par0210" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">AVA is calculated by the continuity equation, which is based on the principle of conservation of mass, assuming that the volume that passes through a given area upstream of the aortic valve is the same as that which passes through the valve. This measure is less flow-dependent than other parameters such as velocity and gradient, but is susceptible to error, since it is only an indirect measure of valve area. Firstly, the continuity equation measures the size of the functional orifice instead of that of the anatomic orifice and thus neglects the coefficient of orifice contraction, and so under normal flow conditions underestimation of the anatomic orifice by the continuity equation is expected to be around 10-15%.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0395"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">22</span></a> Furthermore, LV ejection volume (the numerator in the continuity equation) is usually calculated by two-dimensional echocardiography on the basis of cross-sectional area, assuming the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) to be circular. However, Doddamani et al. used multislice computed tomography (CT)<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0400"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">23</span></a> and three-dimensional echocardiography<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0405"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">24</span></a> to show that the LVOT is in fact more often elliptical than circular. This can result in AVA being underestimated by a further 15%.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0405"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">24</span></a></p><p id="par0215" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Since the severity of AS can be under- or overestimated if the patient has a large or small body surface area (BSA), respectively, it is essential to index valve area to BSA, yielding AVAi, although it should be noted that such indexing may not be appropriate at extreme values of BSA.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0290"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a></p><p id="par0220" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Consistency between echocardiographic criteria of AS severity (AVA by the continuity equation, PFV and MPG) was established following an analysis of 3482 echocardiograms of patients with good global LV systolic function and AVA <2 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>. It was shown that the criterion of AVA ≤1 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> overestimated severity compared to the other two criteria (PFV ≤4 m/s and MPG ≤40 mmHg). The authors accordingly suggested that the cutoff of AVA to define severe AS should be <0.8 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>, which more often corresponds to PFV of ≤4 m/s and MPG of ≤40 mmHg. A limitation was that the authors did not present the clinical results of this reclassification.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0410"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">25</span></a></p><p id="par0225" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">To summarize, although AVA is an essential parameter in the stratification of AS severity, there are significant limitations to its measurement.</p><p id="par0230" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Three-dimensional echocardiography is an alternative method to measuring AVA that has been shown to be more accurate in assessing AVA and AS severity than volumetric methods such as the continuity equation by two-dimensional echocardiography.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0415"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">26</span></a></p><p id="par0235" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Projected AVA (AVA<span class="elsevierStyleInf">proj</span>) is another way to estimate AVA in situations of low systolic flow and associated general systolic dysfunction. It is based on a normal systolic flow (250 ml/ms) by the formula<elsevierMultimedia ident="eq0005"></elsevierMultimedia>where VC is vascular compliance and Q<span class="elsevierStyleInf">rest</span> is systolic ejection flow at rest. AVA<span class="elsevierStyleInf">proj</span>, which is obtained during dobutamine stress echocardiography, appears to offer a good alternative to standard echocardiographic parameters.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0420"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">27</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0065">Assessment of vascular components</span><p id="par0240" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Vascular alterations are particularly important in paradoxical AS. Peripheral BP should be assessed and systemic arterial compliance and peripheral vascular resistance should also be estimated.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0380"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> In a patient with reduced systolic flow, it is important to perform echocardiographic assessment under conditions of controlled BP.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0380"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19,28</span></a></p><p id="par0245" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Valvuloarterial impedance (Zva) is a simple and non-invasive measure of the double hemodynamic load (vascular and valvular) on the left ventricle. It is calculated by dividing LV systolic pressure (the sum of systolic BP and mean transvalvular gradient) by indexed stroke volume.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0430"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29,30</span></a> This parameter has been shown to have prognostic value<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0430"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29</span></a> and is a good marker of myocardial dysfunction.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0440"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">31</span></a> In a substudy of the SEAS (Simvastatin Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis) study,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0445"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">32</span></a> Zva was the main predictor of ventricular dysfunction in patients with severe AS. In a retrospective study, Hachicha et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0430"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29</span></a> identified Zva of >4.5 mmHg/ml/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> as indicating severely increased LV afterload, which was associated with 2.8-fold and 3.7-fold increases in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, respectively. The same study showed that Zva was particularly high in paradoxical AS,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0430"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29</span></a> and it was subsequently confirmed that patients with paradoxical AS present higher Zva than those with classical severe AS.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0335"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> Nevertheless, Zva was not shown to be a good predictor of long-term mortality following valve surgery.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0435"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0045" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0070">Quantification of intrinsic left ventricular function</span><p id="par0250" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Aortic valve replacement is a class I recommendation for patients with severe AS and LV dysfunction as assessed by LVEF, independently of associated symptoms, in the European and American guidelines on valvular disease.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0290"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1,3</span></a> Although widely used, LVEF is prone to measurement errors and is not considered an accurate indicator of LV contractility.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0380"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> There is thus a need for a more precise measure of LV function, using other parameters, in patients with paradoxical AS.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0380"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a></p><p id="par0255" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a complementary measure of myocardial function, assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0450"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">33</span></a> It appears to be less influenced by LV geometry and is considered superior to LVEF for assessment and quantification of intrinsic myocardial function.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0380"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> Several studies have shown that GLS is an early marker of LV dysfunction that decreases gradually with progressively more severe AS.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0380"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> In the study by Lancellotti et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0455"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">34</span></a> GLS of ≤15.9% was associated with higher rates of cardiovascular events in patients with AS. The segmental heterogeneity of GLS in AS has been demonstrated,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0460"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">35</span></a> with reduced GLS more evident in basal segments. However, the use of global and regional strain parameters in paradoxical AS is the subject of debate, and there is disagreement on their value for diagnosis, risk stratification and prognosis. Nevertheless, in the study by Kusunose et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0315"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> GLS was an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio 1.05; 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.07; p<0.01), a cutoff of -12.1% being associated with significantly higher mortality. The study by Sato et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0465"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">36</span></a> came to the same conclusion, although with a cutoff of -17% to predict cardiovascular events. These authors suggest that assessment of GLS could have an important role in risk stratification of patients with paradoxical AS.</p></span><span id="sec0050" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0075">Assessment of myocardial damage</span><p id="par0260" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Prolonged stress on myocardial fibers leads to cellular damage and death by apoptosis. Interstitial myocardial fibrosis is therefore a common finding on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and histological studies,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0380"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> and is associated with persistence of LV dysfunction even after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0470"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">37</span></a></p><p id="par0265" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Readily available biomarkers such as brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) reflect LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction, and the more they are elevated, the more severe the symptoms and the worse the prognosis.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0470"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">37,38</span></a> It should be noted that these peptides do not measure AS severity directly, but only myocardial function, and are not specific to AS.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0380"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19,38</span></a></p></span></span><span id="sec0055" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0080">New parameters for assessment of paradoxical aortic stenosis</span><p id="par0270" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">New parameters for assessment of AS have appeared that are improving understanding of the disease.</p><p id="par0275" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The degree of aortic valve calcification is a strong predictor of disease progression.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0380"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> Although it can be semi-quantitatively assessed by echocardiography, a more precise quantification of calcification is provided by CT.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0380"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> According to the American guidelines, a calcium score of >1000 Agatston units identifies severe aortic valve calcification.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0300"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a> This method is not affected by the patient's hemodynamic characteristics and is thus useful in low-flow states such as paradoxical AS.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0480"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">39</span></a> Messika-Zeitoun et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0485"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">40</span></a> demonstrated a strong association between aortic valve calcification and AVA (r=-0.79, p<0.01).</p><p id="par0280" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In a study of 250 consecutive patients treated by SAVR, Clavel et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0490"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">41</span></a> found that in 70% of patients with paradoxical AS, stenosis was considered severe on the basis of the weights of valves excised during surgery. This percentage is similar to that found in patients with classical severe high-gradient AS (86%).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0490"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">41</span></a> This study confirms that a large proportion of patients with paradoxical AS in fact have a severe form of the disease and highlights the limitations of the echocardiographic methods used for stratifying AS patients, especially valve gradients.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0490"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">41</span></a></p><p id="par0285" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Current guidelines do not differentiate between methods for measuring AVA (catheterization or Doppler echocardiography). AVA can be assessed invasively using the Gorlin formula,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0385"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">20</span></a> but this is dependent on systolic flow and is unsuitable in low cardiac output states. Doppler echocardiography measures the pressure gradient through the valve based on peak systolic flow at the vena contracta, while catheterization determines the pressure gradient between the left ventricle and the ascending aorta, several cm from the valve.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0380"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> The total energy of aortic flow is the sum of kinetic and static energy (pressure). Flow convergence through the stenotic valve converts static to kinetic energy, reducing pressure at the vena contracta. When velocity falls distal to the stenosis, part of the energy is converted back to static energy due to the phenomenon of pressure recovery.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0495"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">42</span></a> The clinical implication of this phenomenon is that Doppler echocardiography underestimates AVA compared to invasive assessment.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0425"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28</span></a> To overcome this limitation, Garcia et al. developed a new index, the energy loss coefficient (ELCo),<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0500"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">43</span></a> to adjust AVA to pressure recovery in the ascending aorta.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0425"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28</span></a> ELCo is calculated by the formula<elsevierMultimedia ident="eq0010"></elsevierMultimedia>where A<span class="elsevierStyleInf">A</span> is the cross-sectional area of the ascending aorta, measured 1 cm downstream of the sinotubular junction.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0380"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19,43</span></a> This index has a good association with prognosis in patients with severe AS, particularly for values ≤0.6 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0505"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">44</span></a> It is also useful in paradoxical AS, giving values close to those from invasive assessment and appearing to have prognostic value.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0425"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28</span></a> Some authors suggest it should be used routinely to assess AS severity, particularly when the diameter of the thoracic aorta is small (<30 mm).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0495"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">42</span></a></p><p id="par0290" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">As mentioned above, AS is nowadays considered to be a systemic vascular disease, with increased systemic vascular stiffness. Recent studies have shown that the vascular mechanics of the aorta can be assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography, an imaging indicator of vascular stiffness,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0510"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">45,46</span></a> and that values are lower in AS than in aortic regurgitation.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0510"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">45</span></a> Moreover, patients with moderate to severe low-flow AS present lower aortic strain values than those with normal systolic flow.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0515"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">46</span></a> Although promising, assessment of valve mechanics by speckle-tracking echocardiography is currently only a research tool due to limitations arising from the need for a good acoustic window on the aorta and the lengthy analysis required.</p><p id="par0295" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">New markers, including neurohormones, adipokines and extracellular matrix modulators, have recently been identified as prognostic and diagnostic factors of severe low-flow, high-gradient AS with preserved LVEF.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0520"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">47</span></a> Their future potential for assessment of patients with paradoxical AS should be the subject of further research.</p></span><span id="sec0060" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0085">Diagnosis</span><p id="par0300" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">When assessment of a patient with AS reveals discordant values of AVA and MPG (AVA ≤1 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> and MPG <40 mmHg), and there is good LV systolic function but reduced systolic flow (SVI ≤35 ml/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>), the possibility of paradoxical AS should be considered. According to Pibarot et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0525"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">48</span></a> a systematic approach is required (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Figure 3</a>). Other morbidities such as significant mitral or tricuspid valve disease should be ruled out at the outset, as should measurement errors and misplacement of the Doppler sample volume. Echocardiographic assessment should be performed under normal blood pressure conditions. AVA should be indexed to BSA and body mass index should also be considered. An AVAi of ≤0.6 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> indicates severe AS. Signs of LV remodeling suggest the presence of paradoxical severe AS. When the severity of AS is in doubt, additional information can be obtained from other parameters such as aortic valve calcium score, anatomical AVA, Zva, ELCo, and strain parameters, which may indicate not only severity but also the diagnosis of paradoxical AS.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0380"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a></p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0015"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0065" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0090">Prognosis</span><p id="par0305" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Various studies have indicated that the combination of low systolic flow, low transvalvular gradient, and preserved global systolic function is a marker of poor outcome.<ul class="elsevierStyleList" id="lis0005"><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0005"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0310" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Hachica et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0325"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> in a retrospective study of 512 consecutive patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF, showed that low flow (SVI ≤35 ml/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>) was associated with worse outcome at three years.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0010"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0315" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Mohty et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0370"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> in a study of 768 patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF, observed that low flow and low gradient was associated with reduced long-term survival after adjustment for other factors.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0015"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0320" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In an observational study of 1704 consecutive patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF, Eleid et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0320"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> showed that the low-flow, low-gradient phenotype was the strongest predictor of mortality.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0020"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0325" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Lancellotti et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0530"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">49</span></a> in a prospective study of 150 consecutive patients with severe AS, demonstrated that patients with low flow and low gradient had worse clinical outcomes than those with normal flow and low gradient; in this study both low flow and low gradient were independent predictors of poor outcome.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0025"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0330" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In a subanalysis of 971 patients with severe AS of the Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve Trial Edwards SAPIEN Transcatheter Heart Valve (PARTNER) trial, Herrmann et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0535"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">50</span></a> showed that only low flow independently predicted mortality in both cohort A (high-risk patients) and cohort B (inoperable patients). All-cause mortality at two years was also significantly higher in low-flow than in normal-flow AS.</p></li></ul></p><p id="par0335" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">There is thus general agreement in the literature that low-flow states in severe AS with good global systolic function are associated with worse medium- and long-term prognosis.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0335"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> Cardiovascular events are more frequent in patients with paradoxical AS than in those with normal-flow AS,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0350"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13,51</span></a> and survival at one and five years in a retrospective study of 1589 patients by Clavel et al. was less than in patients with moderate AS.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0335"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a></p><p id="par0340" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Not all authors draw the same conclusions. In a recent study,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0395"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">22</span></a> Maes et al. prospectively assessed 349 patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF, divided into two groups according to MPG (>40 mmHg or ≤40 mmHg). Prognosis as measured by all-cause survival at four years was better in patients with paradoxical AS than in those with classical severe high-gradient AS.</p><p id="par0345" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Similarly, in a subanalysis of the SEAS study, Jander et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0545"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">52</span></a> showed that patients with paradoxical AS had similar clinical outcomes to those with moderate AS.</p></span><span id="sec0070" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0095">Natural history</span><p id="par0350" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The natural history of paradoxical AS has been the subject of intense debate since 2007, and as reported above, there seems to have been a change in the disease paradigm. As shown in Model A (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0020">Figure 4</a>), after a stage in which AS reaches a certain level of severity, in the absence of treatment the patient may evolve to a phenotype in which LV dilatation and systolic dysfunction predominate, leading to reduced systolic flow and transvalvular gradients. The initial studies by Hachicha et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0325"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> and Lancellotti et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0530"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">49</span></a> suggested that patients with severe AS can also evolve to a different phenotype. In this view, paradoxical AS represents an advanced stage of aortic valve disease due to marked LV interstitial fibrosis, reduced chamber size and increased systemic vascular stiffness, leading to diminished LV systolic flow and hence reductions in pressure gradients and aortic valve area. As described above, the fact that patients with paradoxical AS have worse outcome than those with classical (high-gradient) severe AS corroborates this model.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0020"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0355" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Recent findings, however, point to a different evolution of the disease (Model B in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0020">Figure 4</a>). Maes et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0395"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">22</span></a> suggest that paradoxical AS represents an intermediate stage in progression to severe high-gradient AS. The prognosis of patients with paradoxical AS is similar to that of those with moderate AS and is better than in high-gradient severe forms. Furthermore, in the absence of valve replacement, severe AS evolves to a low-flow, low-gradient form and not to paradoxical AS. According to Maes et al., the concept of paradoxical AS is probably due to inaccuracies in the calculation of AVA using the continuity equation, as discussed above.</p></span><span id="sec0075" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0100">Treatment</span><p id="par0360" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">AS should not be considered an isolated disease of the aortic valve, but rather a systemic vascular disease involving atherosclerosis and arteriosclerosis. In addition, its clinical manifestations also depend on ventricular remodeling and LV function.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0325"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> Treatment should bear all these factors in mind.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0325"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a></p><span id="sec0080" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0105">Vascular component</span><p id="par0365" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Regarding the vascular component of AS, from a clinical standpoint it is important to optimize BP.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0325"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8,53</span></a> Antihypertensive therapy reduces afterload and LV filling pressures as well as pulmonary artery pressure.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0550"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">53</span></a> No specific antihypertensive drug class is recommended for AS in the American and European guidelines<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0290"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1,3</span></a> However, diuretics should be used with care in patients with paradoxical AS to avoid excessive reductions in preload, which can further reduce systolic ejection volume. Vasodilators are not apparently contraindicated in these patients, but this is based on a single study in an acute setting using intravenous sodium nitroprusside. In a prospective study of 24 patients with paradoxical AS, Eleid et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0550"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">53</span></a> demonstrated that sodium nitroprusside infusion reduced total LV afterload with no significant secondary effects.</p></span><span id="sec0085" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0110">Valvular component</span><p id="par0370" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">As pointed out above, paradoxical severe AS may represent a more advance stage of the disease and therefore have a worse prognosis.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0325"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8,41,50</span></a> In the presence of typical symptoms and the absence of contraindications, patients should therefore undergo SAVR.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0325"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8,17,41,50,54</span></a> In the American and European guidelines, SAVR is a class IIa recommendation for patients with confirmed severe LF-LG-AS and preserved LVEF.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0290"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1,3</span></a> However, patients with paradoxical AS are in fact less often referred for surgery,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0325"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8,10,17,28</span></a> both because of underestimation of AS severity by the standard assessment parameters (AVA, MPG and SVI) and due to the epidemiological context of the disease.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0335"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10,17,41</span></a></p><span id="sec0090" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0115">Surgical aortic valve replacement</span><p id="par0375" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In patients with paradoxical AS, SAVR is demonstrably superior to medical therapy in improving prognosis, as confirmed by various authors.<ul class="elsevierStyleList" id="lis0010"><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0030"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0380" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Hachicha et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0325"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> in their retrospective study of 512 consecutive patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF, observed that patients with low-flow AS treated medically had worse three-year survival than those treated surgically (58% vs. 93%, p<0.01).</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0035"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0385" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the retrospective study of 1589 patients with moderate or severe AS and LVEF >50% by Clavel et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0335"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> SAVR was an independent predictor of survival in the paradoxical AS group (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0025">Figure 5</a>).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0025"></elsevierMultimedia></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0040"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0390" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Mohty et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0370"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> in their observational study of 768 patients with severe AS and LVEF >50% divided into four groups according to MPG (<40 vs. ≥40 mmHg) and SVI (<35 vs. ≥35 ml/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>), reported that patients with LF-LG-AS who underwent SAVR had better long-term survival than those treated medically.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0045"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0395" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In their prospective study of 260 patients with severe symptomatic AS with MPG <40 mmHg and LVEF ≤50%, Ozkan et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0555"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">54</span></a> demonstrated that SAVR was associated with better outcome and that mortality in patients treated medically was twice that in patients undergoing SAVR.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0050"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0400" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The observational study by Eleid et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0320"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> of 1704 consecutive patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF, divided into four groups according to SVI and MPG, showed that SAVR was associated with lower mortality in patients with low flow and low gradient.</p></li></ul></p><p id="par0405" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">By contrast, Maes et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0395"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">22</span></a> in their prospective study of 349 patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF, demonstrated that survival without SAVR was better in patients with paradoxical AS compared to those with classical high-gradient severe AS. In this study, low flow did not influence prognosis. However, all groups showed better survival after SAVR. The same study showed that survival of patients with paradoxical AS was better after SAVR compared to medical therapy.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0395"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">22</span></a></p><p id="par0410" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It should be noted that operative mortality in patients with paradoxical AS is higher than in those with severe high-grade AS,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0370"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> probably due to older age, more comorbidities (both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular) and, as explained above, possibly a more advanced stage of the disease.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0370"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> Furthermore, patients with paradoxical AS are prone to patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) (AVAi ≤0.85 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>) and the combination of paradoxical AS and postoperative PPM is associated with worse prognosis.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0560"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">55</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0095" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0120">Transcatheter aortic valve replacement</span><p id="par0415" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In patients considered unsuitable for SAVR due to contraindications or high surgical risk, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an alternative treatment.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0290"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> TAVR leads to better outcomes and long-term survival than medical therapy, and its results in paradoxical AS are similar to those in classical severe AS, as shown by the following studies.<ul class="elsevierStyleList" id="lis0015"><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0055"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0420" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">O'Sullivan et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0565"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">56</span></a> in a retrospective study of 354 patients with severe AS treated by TAVR, showed that patients with paradoxical AS had similar mortality to those with classical severe AS.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0060"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0425" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In a subanalysis of the PARTNER trial of 971 randomized patients with severe AS, Herrmann et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0535"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">50</span></a> demonstrated that in paradoxical AS, TAVR reduced mortality from 73% to 43% in inoperable patients (p<0.01) compared to medical therapy.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0065"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0430" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In their prospective study of 3077 consecutive patients from the GARY (German Aortic Valve Registry) registry treated by TAVR, Lauten et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0570"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">57</span></a> showed that clinical outcomes were similar between paradoxical AS and classical severe AS and that there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of mortality at one year after the procedure.</p></li></ul></p><p id="par0435" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The decision whether to proceed with TAVR in patients with paradoxical AS depends on the heart team, who review indications and contraindications for valve replacement locally and on a case-by-case basis.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0290"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> Another subanalysis of the PARTNER trial found no significant differences in mortality among high-risk patients between SAVR and TAVR (39% vs. 38.3%, p=0.69), and the debate continues concerning the best treatment for patients with paradoxical AS.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0530"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">49</span></a></p><p id="par0440" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">To summarize, the literature seems relatively unanimous on the need for valve replacement, whether surgical or percutaneous, in symptomatic patients with paradoxical AS.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0290"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> As shown above, both options improve prognosis, survival and clinical status in patients with paradoxical AS compared to medical therapy. The final decision concerning which treatment to adopt will depend on assessment of the patient's surgical risk and the logistics of the center involved.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0290"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a></p></span></span></span><span id="sec0100" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0125">Discussion</span><p id="par0445" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Paradoxical AS was described for the first time in 2007 and its phenotypic characteristics have been confirmed by various groups. However, questions remain concerning inconsistencies in the continuity equation for measurement of AVA that may explain the conflicting findings in this phenotype and could lead to reclassification of some forms of severe AS as moderate AS. Non-invasive diagnostic methods have been developed that can better identify the paradoxical form of severe AS, including assessment of LV remodeling and of the vascular component, measurement of VA and of the LVOT by three-dimensional methods (tomographic and non-tomographic), and calculation of the calcium score of the aortic valve.</p><p id="par0450" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The data presented above appear to indicate that the prognosis of patients with paradoxical AS is poor, although it is not clear whether model A or B (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0020">Figure 4</a>) explains the stage it represents in the natural history of AS.</p><p id="par0455" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It should be noted that most of the studies analyzed indicate that the prognosis of patients with paradoxical AS is better following valve replacement than with medical therapy. In the European and American guidelines valve replacement is a class IIa recommendation (albeit with level of evidence C) for symptomatic paradoxical AS. The limitations of studies assessing the prognostic impact of valve replacement in patients with paradoxical AS – including patient selection, study design (single center, retrospective analysis, lack of randomization) and confounding variables – are summarized in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#sec0125">Supplementary Table 1</a>.</p></span><span id="sec0105" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0130">Conclusions</span><p id="par0460" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The phenotype of paradoxical AS, characterized by low systolic ejection volume and low gradient, is common in patients with AS and preserved LV systolic function. Measurement errors, inconsistencies in the continuity equation and lack of BP control can lead to contradictory findings when assessing a patient with AS. Although there is some disagreement in the literature, the prognosis of symptomatic paradoxical AS is poor and in such cases valve replacement should be considered.</p></span><span id="sec0110" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0135">Limitations</span><p id="par0465" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The present review includes only articles published up to December 2014. It should be noted that the representativeness of the studies in the quality assessment was low (25%).</p></span><span id="sec0115" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0140">Contributions</span><p id="par0470" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">RC performed the bibliographic search, produced the literature summary and wrote the first version of the manuscript. RT designed the review, discussed the results, modified the initial document for submission and responded to the reviewers. MJV carried out the quality assessment and played an important part in the response to the reviewers. LG contributed to the discussion of the results and to correction of the manuscript.</p></span><span id="sec0120" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0145">Conflicts of interest</span><p id="par0475" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:21 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres831935" "titulo" => "Abstract" "secciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec827772" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres831936" "titulo" => "Resumo" "secciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" ] ] ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec827773" "titulo" => "Palavras-chave" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Methods" ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Definition" ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Clinical characteristics" ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0030" "titulo" => "Diagnosis of paradoxical aortic stenosis" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0035" "titulo" => "Problems with calculation of aortic valve area" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0040" "titulo" => "Assessment of vascular components" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0045" "titulo" => "Quantification of intrinsic left ventricular function" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0050" "titulo" => "Assessment of myocardial damage" ] ] ] 10 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0055" "titulo" => "New parameters for assessment of paradoxical aortic stenosis" ] 11 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0060" "titulo" => "Diagnosis" ] 12 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0065" "titulo" => "Prognosis" ] 13 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0070" "titulo" => "Natural history" ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0075" "titulo" => "Treatment" "secciones" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0080" "titulo" => "Vascular component" ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0085" "titulo" => "Valvular component" "secciones" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0090" "titulo" => "Surgical aortic valve replacement" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0095" "titulo" => "Transcatheter aortic valve replacement" ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0100" "titulo" => "Discussion" ] 16 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0105" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] 17 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0110" "titulo" => "Limitations" ] 18 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0115" "titulo" => "Contributions" ] 19 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0120" "titulo" => "Conflicts of interest" ] 20 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2016-02-11" "fechaAceptado" => "2016-09-29" "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec827772" "palabras" => array:7 [ 0 => "Paradoxical aortic stenosis" 1 => "Low systolic flow" 2 => "Low gradient" 3 => "Vascular stiffness" 4 => "Diagnosis" 5 => "Treatment" 6 => "Prognosis" ] ] ] "pt" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palavras-chave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec827773" "palabras" => array:7 [ 0 => "Estenose aórtica paradoxal" 1 => "Baixo fluxo sistólico" 2 => "Baixo gradiente" 3 => "Rigidez vascular" 4 => "Diagnóstico" 5 => "Tratamento" 6 => "Prognóstico" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Aortic stenosis (AS) is a complex systemic valvular and vascular disease with a high prevalence in developed countries. The new entity “paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis” refers to cases in which patients have severe AS based on assessment of aortic valve area (AVA) (≤1 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>) or indexed AVA (≤0.6 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>), but paradoxically have a low mean transvalvular gradient (<40 mmHg) and a low stroke volume index (≤35 ml/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>), despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (>50%).</p><p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">A search was carried out in the PubMed database on paradoxical AS for the period 2007-2014. A total of 57 articles were included for this review. The prevalence of paradoxical AS ranged from 3% to 35% of the population with severe degenerative AS. It was more frequent in females and in older patients. Paradoxical AS was associated with characteristic left ventricular remodeling as well as an increase in systemic arterial stiffness. It was noted that there may be errors and inaccuracies in the calculation of AVA by the continuity equation, which could erroneously suggest the paradoxical phenotype. There are new diagnostic methods to facilitate the study of AS, such as aortic valve calcium score, valvuloarterial impedance and the longitudinal mechanics of the left ventricle. With regard to its natural history, it is not clear whether paradoxical AS corresponds to an advance stage of the disease or if paradoxical AS patients have a distinct phenotype with specific characteristics. Valve replacement, either surgical or percutaneous, may be indicated in patients with severe and symptomatic paradoxical AS.</p></span>" ] "pt" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Resumo" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">A estenose aórtica (EA) é uma doença valvular e vascular sistémica, com elevada prevalência nos países desenvolvidos. A nova entidade «EA grave paradoxal, baixo fluxo/baixo gradiente» refere-se aos casos em que os doentes apresentam EA grave com base na avaliação da área valvular aórtica (AVA) (<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>≤<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>) ou AVA indexada (<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>≤<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0,6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>), mas que paradoxalmente tenham um gradiente médio transvalvular baixo (<<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>40<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mmHg), com baixo volume de ejeção sistólico indexado (≤<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>35<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ml/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>), apesar de uma fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo preservada (><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>50%).</p><p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Foi realizada uma pesquisa através da base de dados da <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">PubMed</span> sobre a EA paradoxal no período de 2007-2014<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">.</span> Para a presente revisão foram incluídos um total de 57 artigos.</p><p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">A prevalência da EA paradoxal variou entre 3-35% da população com EA degenerativa grave. Foi mais frequente no género feminino e nos doentes com idade mais avançada, e esteve associada a uma remodelagem característica do ventrículo esquerdo, bem como a um aumento da rigidez vascular arterial sistémica. Assinala-se a possibilidade de erros e imprecisões no cálculo da AVA pela equação da continuidade, que podem sugerir o fenótipo paradoxal. Existem outros métodos de diagnóstico que podem auxiliar no estudo da EA, como o <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">score</span> de cálcio, a avaliação da impedância valvuloarterial e o estudo da mecânica longitudinal do ventrículo esquerdo. Relativamente à história natural, não é claro que a EA paradoxal corresponda a uma fase avançada da doença valvular aórtica, ou se representa um fenótipo distinto com especificidades próprias. A terapêutica de substituição valvular, cirúrgica ou percutânea, pode estar indicada no doente com EA paradoxal grave e sintomática.</p></span>" ] ] "NotaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "☆" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0005">Please cite this article as: Cavaca R, Teixeira R, Vieira MJ, Gonçalves L. Estenose aórtica paradoxal – revisão sistemática. Rev Port Cardiol. 2017;36:287–305.</p>" ] ] "apendice" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "apendice" => "<p id="par0485" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><elsevierMultimedia ident="upi0005"></elsevierMultimedia></p>" "etiqueta" => "Appendix A" "titulo" => "Supplementary material" "identificador" => "sec0130" ] ] ] ] "nomenclatura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "nom0005" "titulo" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0025">List of abbreviations</span>" "listaDefinicion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "definicion" => array:25 [ 0 => array:2 [ "termino" => "AF" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">atrial fibrillation</p>" ] 1 => array:2 [ "termino" => "AS" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">aortic stenosis</p>" ] 2 => array:2 [ "termino" => "AVA" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">aortic valve area</p>" ] 3 => array:2 [ "termino" => "AVAi" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">indexed aortic valve area</p>" ] 4 => array:2 [ "termino" => "AVA<span class="elsevierStyleInf">proj</span>" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">projected aortic valve area</p>" ] 5 => array:2 [ "termino" => "BNP" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">brain natriuretic peptide</p>" ] 6 => array:2 [ "termino" => "BP" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">blood pressure</p>" ] 7 => array:2 [ "termino" => "BSA" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">body surface area</p>" ] 8 => array:2 [ "termino" => "CAD" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">coronary artery disease</p>" ] 9 => array:2 [ "termino" => "CT" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">computed tomography</p>" ] 10 => array:2 [ "termino" => "ELCo" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">energy loss coefficient</p>" ] 11 => array:2 [ "termino" => "GLS" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">left ventricular global longitudinal strain</p>" ] 12 => array:2 [ "termino" => "HR" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">heart rate</p>" ] 13 => array:2 [ "termino" => "LF-LG-AS" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis</p>" ] 14 => array:2 [ "termino" => "LV" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">left ventricular</p>" ] 15 => array:2 [ "termino" => "LVEF" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">left ventricular ejection fraction</p>" ] 16 => array:2 [ "termino" => "LVOT" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">left ventricular outflow tract</p>" ] 17 => array:2 [ "termino" => "MPG" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">mean pressure gradient between aorta and left ventricle</p>" ] 18 => array:2 [ "termino" => "PFV" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">peak flow velocity</p>" ] 19 => array:2 [ "termino" => "PVR" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">peripheral vascular resistance</p>" ] 20 => array:2 [ "termino" => "SAC" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">systemic arterial compliance</p>" ] 21 => array:2 [ "termino" => "SAVR" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">surgical aortic valve replacement</p>" ] 22 => array:2 [ "termino" => "SVI" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0115" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">stroke volume index</p>" ] 23 => array:2 [ "termino" => "TAVR" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0120" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">transcatheter aortic valve replacement</p>" ] 24 => array:2 [ "termino" => "Zva" "descripcion" => "<p id="par0125" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">valvuloarterial impedance</p>" ] ] ] ] ] ] "multimedia" => array:9 [ 0 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1542 "Ancho" => 2215 "Tamanyo" => 211315 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Flowchart of the study design.</p>" ] ] 1 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 2201 "Ancho" => 2347 "Tamanyo" => 255495 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Prevalence of paradoxical aortic stenosis as a percentage of all patients with severe aortic stenosis. cath: catheterization; echo: echocardiography.</p>" ] ] 2 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0015" "etiqueta" => "Figure 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "fuente" => "Adapted from Pibarot et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0525"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">48</span></a>" "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr3.jpeg" "Alto" => 1590 "Ancho" => 2278 "Tamanyo" => 221366 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Algorithm for diagnosis of paradoxical aortic stenosis. 3D echo: three-dimensional echocardiography; AF: atrial fibrillation; AS: aortic stenosis; AVA: aortic valve area; AVAi: aortic valve area indexed to body surface area; BSA: body surface area; BNP: brain natriuretic peptide; CT: computed tomography; ELCo: energy loss coefficient; GLS: global longitudinal strain; LV: left ventricular; LVEDD: left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVEDVi: indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; LVOT: left ventricular outflow tract; MPG: mean pressure gradient between aorta and left ventricle; RWTR: relative wall thickness ratio; SVI: stroke volume index; Zva: valvuloarterial impedance.</p>" ] ] 3 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0020" "etiqueta" => "Figure 4" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr4.jpeg" "Alto" => 1375 "Ancho" => 2340 "Tamanyo" => 101326 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Two models of the natural history of aortic stenosis. AS: aortic stenosis; LF-LG-AS: low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis.</p>" ] ] 4 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0025" "etiqueta" => "Figure 5" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr5.jpeg" "Alto" => 2243 "Ancho" => 3215 "Tamanyo" => 436987 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Kaplan-Meier analysis of combined (aortic valve replacement [AVR], or death) events (A), AVR (B), overall survival (C), and cardiovascular survival (D). In (A), event-free survival at one and five years was 63% and 24% for paradoxical AS, 30% and 9% for severe high-gradient AS, and 85% and 41% for moderate AS, respectively (p<0.01). In (B), it can be seen that patients with paradoxical AS were less often referred for AVR than those with severe high-gradient AS but more often than those with moderate AS.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0335"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> Overall and cardiovascular survival (C and D, respectively) were lower in paradoxical AS than in high-gradient severe AS and moderate AS. HG-SAS group: patients with high-gradient severe aortic stenosis; MAS group: patients with moderate aortic stenosis; PLG-SAS group: patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient, severe aortic stenosis.</p> <p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Figure reproduced from Clavel et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0335"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> with permission from Elsevier.</p>" ] ] 5 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at1" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0070" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">AF: atrial fibrillation; AS: aortic stenosis; AVA: aortic valve area; BP: blood pressure; BSA: body surface area; CAD: coronary artery disease; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ELCo: energy loss coefficient; GLS: left ventricular global longitudinal strain; HR: heart rate; AVAi: indexed aortic valve area; LF-LG-AS: low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis; LV: left ventricular; LVEDD: left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVEDV: left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; MPG: mean pressure gradient between aorta and left ventricle; NYHA: New York Heart Association; PFV: peak flow velocity; PPM: patient-prosthesis mismatch; PVR: peripheral vascular resistance; SAC: systemic arterial compliance; SAVR: surgical aortic valve replacement; SVI: stroke volume index; TAVR: transcatheter aortic valve replacement; Zva: valvuloarterial impedance.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Study and year \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Type of study and sample \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Main conclusions \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Hachicha et al., 2007<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0325"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Retrospective study of 512 consecutive patients with severe AS (AVA <0.6 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>) and LVEF >50%, divided into two groups:<br>-low flow: SVI ≤35 ml/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> (n=181) – paradoxical AS<br>-normal flow: SVI >35 ml/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> (n=335) – classical AS \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">1. 35% of patients presented SVI ≤35 ml/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>.<br>2. Patients with low-flow AS were mainly female, had small left ventricle with concentric remodeling and lower LVEF. Zva was higher.<br>3. SVI ≤35 ml/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> was associated with lower three-year survival (76% vs. 86%, p<0.01).<br>4. Patients with low flow treated medically had worse outcome than those treated surgically at three years (58% vs. 93%, p=0.001). \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Lee et al., 2011<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0350"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Prospective comparative study of 103 patients with AS and LVEF >50%, divided into two groups:<br>-87 patients with normal flow AS;<br>-16 patients with paradoxical AS (SVI ≤35 ml/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>). \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">1. Patients with paradoxical AS had larger BSA, less hypertension and were more likely to have AF.<br>2. Patients with paradoxical AS were more symptomatic (p=0.02).<br>3. LVEF was significantly lower in the group with paradoxical AS.<br>4. Patients with paradoxical AS had greater myocardial thickness and were more likely to have greater concentric LV remodeling.<br>5. AVA and AVAi were significantly lower in the group with paradoxical AS.<br>6. GLS was significantly lower and Zva was significantly higher in the group with paradoxical AS (p<0.01 for both).<br>7. GLS showed a negative correlation with SVI (r=-0.324, p=0.001) and AVAi (r=-0.377, p<0.001) and a positive correlation with Zva (r=0.437, p<0.001).<br>8. Only age and Zva were significant determinants of GLS.<br>9. Patients with paradoxical AS had more cardiovascular events than those with normal-flow AS (93.8% vs. 69.8%).<br>10. Subclinical myocardial dysfunction may be more prominent in paradoxical AS compared with normal-flow AS. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Jander et al., 2011<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0545"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">52</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Prospective study of 1525 randomized patients in the SEAS trial, with asymptomatic AS and LVEF ≤55%. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">1. Severe AS was present in 29% of the population and moderate AS in 12%; 2% had severe AS with high gradient, 1% had AVA >1.0 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> and high gradient and 56% had AS with AVA >1.5 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>.<br>2. Patients with low gradient were older, with lower BSA, more often female and had higher systolic BP, than those with moderate AS.<br>3. Patients with severe AS and low gradient had lower MPG and smaller AVA than those with moderate AS.<br>4. At one year, few aortic valve events occurred in patients with either severe low-flow AS or moderate AS (3.2% vs. 3.8%, p=0.71).<br>5. There were no differences in major cardiovascular events (4.8% vs. 4.3%, p=0.80) or cardiac death (1.1% vs. 0.5%, p=0.49) at one year between the group with severe low-gradient AS and the group with moderate AS.<br>6. Over the whole study period (45.8±14.1 months) aortic valve events occurred in 48.5% of patients with severe AS and low gradient vs. 44.6% in those with moderate AS.<br>7. Patients with severe LF-LG-AS (SVI ≤35 ml/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>, n=223) had similar rates of aortic valve events to those with normal-flow severe AS (46.2% vs. 50.9%, p=0.53).<br>8. In patients with severe low-gradient AS, cardiovascular mortality was similar in those undergoing SAVR and those treated medically (6.0% vs. 9.1%, p=0.23).<br>9. Patients with severe low-gradient AS had similar mortality from cardiovascular cause to those with classical severe AS (7.8% vs. 5.7%, p=0.65).<br>10. Progression to classical severe AS was seen in 38% of patients with moderate AS and 41% of those with severe low-gradient AS.<br>11. Patients with classical severe AS had more aortic valve events and major cardiovascular events than those with severe low-gradient AS or those with moderate AS (both p<0.01). \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Clavel et al., 2012<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0335"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Retrospective study of 1589 patients with moderate AS and LVEF >50%, divided into three matched groups:<br>-187 patients with severe paradoxical AS (AVA <1 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>; MPG <40 mmHg, SVI ≤35 ml/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>, LVEF ≤50%) (group 1)<br>-187 patients with severe AS (AVA ≤0.6 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>; MPG >40 mmHg) (group 2)<br>-187 patients with moderate AS (AVA >0.6 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>) (group 3) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">1. Patients with paradoxical AS were older, more often female, and had greater prevalence of CAD and hypertension, higher Zva and HR, and lower BSA, LVEF and LVEDV.<br>2. Patients with paradoxical AS had higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality at one and five years than those with moderate or severe AS.<br>3. Aortic valve replacement predicted survival in patients with paradoxical and severe AS, but not in patients with moderate AS.<br>4. Factors independently associated with higher all-cause mortality were advanced age (p<0.01), conservative treatment (p<0.01), reduced LVEF (p=0.03) and paradoxical AS (p=0.02).<br>5. Prognosis of patients with paradoxical AS was worse than of patients with severe high-gradient or moderate AS. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Mohty et al., 2013<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0370"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Observational study of 768 patients with severe AS (AVA ≤1 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>) and LVEF >50%, divided into four groups by MPG (<40 vs. ≥40 mmHg) and SVI (<35 vs. ≥35 ml/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>):<br>-normal flow, high gradient (NFHG group);<br>-low flow, low gradient (LFLG group);<br>-low flow, high gradient (LFHG group);<br>-low flow, low gradient (NFLG group). \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">1. In the study population, 58% were male, 89% symptomatic, 50% hypertensive and 90.7% underwent SAVR.<br>2. The NFHG group accounted for 50% of the population, the LFLG group 13%, the LFHG group 15% and the NFLG group 22%.<br>3. Patients in the LFLG group were significantly older (p<0.01), with higher rates of AF (p<0.01), higher HR (p<0.01), lower LVEF (p=0.01) and a trend for higher rates of CAD (p=0.07) than in the other groups.<br>4. The LFLG group had significantly higher PVR and Zva (both p<0.01) than the other groups, but reduced SAC (p<0.01).<br>5. SAVR was less often performed in the LFLG group than in the other groups: 84% vs. 94% (NFHG), 87% (NFLG) and 91% (LFHG) (p<0.01).<br>6. Operative mortality in SAVR was higher in the LFLG group (p=0.01).<br>7. Survival at 10 years was lower in the LFLG group (32%) than in the NFHG group (66%), which had a more favorable 10-year prognosis.<br>8. After adjustment for other risk factors, LF-LG-AS was independently associated with lower long-term survival (p<0.01).<br>9. Patients in the LFLG group had better long-term survival when treated by SAVR than by medical therapy (p<0.01).<br>10. SAVR was significantly associated with better survival in the LFLG group (p<0.01) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">O'Sullivan et al., 2013<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0565"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">56</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Retrospective study of 354 patients with severe AS (AVAi ≤0.6 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> or MPG >40 mmHg) treated by TAVR, divided into three groups:<br>-208 patients with MPG >40 mmHg (group 1);<br>-85 patients with AVAi ≤0.6 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>,<br>MPG <40 mmHg, SVI ≤35 ml/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> and<br>LVEF ≤50% (group 2);<br>-61 patients with AVAi ≤0.6 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>,<br>MPG ≤40 mmHg and LVEF ≤40% (group 3). \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">1. Patients in group 2 had significantly greater AVAi than the other groups.<br>2. Compared to group 1, groups 2 and 3 had higher PVR (p<0.01) but lower Zva (p=0.027).<br>3. All-cause and cardiovascular mortality at 30 days differed between the three groups.<br>4. Functional improvement measured by NYHA class at one year was seen in most patients in all groups (p=0.09).<br>5. No significant differences in one-year mortality were seen between the three groups (p=0.67). \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top"><br>Eleid et al., 2013<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0550"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">53</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Prospective comparative study of 24 patients with severe low-gradient (<40 mmHg) symptomatic AS (AVA ≤1 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> or AVAi ≤0.6 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>), divided into two groups:<br>-18 patients with preserved LVEF (>50%) (group 1);<br>-six patients with reduced LVEF (≤50%) (group 2). \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">1. Patients in group 1 were older and most were hypertensive.<br>2. In group 1, all patients had pulmonary hypertension, elevated ventricular filling pressures and reduced SVI.<br>2. Patient in group 1 presented a close correlation between systolic aortic pressure and LV end-diastolic pressure (r=0.64, p<0.01).<br>3. No significant correlation was found in group 1 between systolic aortic pressure and MPG (r=-0.18, p=0.29).<br>4. All measures of LV afterload improved after nitroprusside infusion in both groups.<br>5. Nitroprusside infusion reduced mean aortic pressure, LV end-diastolic pressure and mean pulmonary artery pressure (p<0.05).<br>6. In group 1, MPG increased from 27 to 29 mmHg (p=0.02) after nitroprusside infusion and AVA increased from 0.86 to 1.02 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> (p<0.01). \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Herrmann et al., 2013<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0535"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">50</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Multicenter randomized clinical trial (PARTNER) of 971 patients with severe AS (AVA <0.8 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> or AVAi <0.5 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> and MPG ≤40 mmHg or PFV ≤4.0 m/s), divided into two cohorts:<br>-Cohort A: high-risk patients;<br>-Cohort B: inoperable patients. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">1. 55% of patients had low flow and 45% had normal flow.<br>2. 45% of patients had low gradient (≤40 mmHg).<br>3. 23% of patients had low flow and reduced LVEF (<50%).<br>4. 15% of patients had low flow, reduced LVEF (<50%) and<br>MPG <40 mmHg.<br>5. The prevalence of paradoxical AS was 31%.<br>6. Patients with low flow had more comorbidities including CAD, pacemakers, symptoms of heart failure, and higher pulmonary artery pressures than patients with normal flow.<br>7. All-cause mortality at two years was significantly higher in patients with low flow compared to those with normal flow (47% vs. 34%, p<0.01).<br>8. Surgical or percutaneous valve replacement was associated with a marked increase in survival at one and two years: mortality with medical therapy was 76% at two years, compared to 38-46% with TAVR or SAVR.<br>9. Two-year survival was significantly better with SAVR than with medical therapy in cohort B (p<0.01).<br>10. No significant difference was seen in two-year survival in cohort A between SAVR and TAVR (p=0.47).<br>11. Patients in cohort A with low flow had higher mortality at two years than those with normal flow, whether treated by SAVR (38% vs. 29%) or by TAVR (40% vs. 25%).<br>12. Patients in cohort B with low flow had higher mortality than those with normal flow, but both improved with SAVR (46% vs. 76% with low flow and 38% vs. 53% with normal flow, p<0.01).<br>13. In patients with paradoxical AS mortality was lower following SAVR than with medical therapy (p<0.01).<br>14. In patients with paradoxical AS, SAVR reduced one-year mortality from 66% to 35% (p=0.02).<br>15. In patients with paradoxical AS in cohort A there was no significant difference between TAVR and SAVR (39% vs. 38.3%, p=0.69).<br>16. Only low flow was an independent predictor of mortality in both cohorts, while LVEF and MPG did not show a significant correlation. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Ozkan et al., 2013<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0555"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">54</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Prospective study of 260 patients with severe symptomatic AS (AVAi ≤0.6 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>), with MPG <40 mmHg and LVEF ≤50%. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">1. 53% of patients received medical therapy and 47% underwent TAVR or SAVR.<br>2. Compared to patients undergoing SAVR or TAVR, patients receiving medical therapy had a greater prevalence of diabetes, lower BP, greater use of diuretics and higher creatinine levels.<br>3. Patients undergoing TAVR were older and more often female than those undergoing SAVR.<br>4. Compared to patients with normal flow and low gradient, patients with low flow and low gradient had lower LVEF (62% vs. 59%, p<0.01), more severe AS (AVAi 0.46 vs. 0.35 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>, p<0.01) and higher Zva (3.9 vs. 5.6 mmHg/ml/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>, p<0.01).<br>5. During follow-up of 28±24 months, 105 patients died (40%): 30% of those undergoing SAVR and 70% of those treated medically.<br>6. SAVR was associated with more favorable outcome (p<0.01).<br>7. SAVR was independently associated with outcome (p<0.013).<br>8. Patients treated medically had two-fold higher all-cause mortality.<br>9. Patients with low flow and low gradient had similar survival after SAVR to those with normal flow and low gradient.<br>10. In unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with low flow and low gradient had worse outcome (p=0.007).<br>11. After adjustment for age, gender and treatment, there was no association between flow pattern and clinical outcome (p=0.64). \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Eleid et al., 2013<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0320"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Observational study of 1704 consecutive patients with severe AS (AVA <1.0 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>) and preserved LVEF (≤50%) assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography, divided into four groups according to SVI (<35 ml/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> vs. ≤35 ml/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>) and MPG (<40 mmHg vs. ≤40 mmHg):<br>-50 patients with low flow and high gradient (LF/HG);<br>-53 patients with low flow and low gradient (LF/LG);<br>-352 patients with normal flow and low gradient (NF/LG);<br>-1249 patients with normal flow and high gradient (NF/HG). \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">1. The NF/LG group (21%) had better survival with medical therapy (82% vs. 67% in the NF/HG group, p<0.01).<br>2. The LF/LG group (3%) had smaller LV size, higher Zva, lower LVEF, greater prevalence of AF and heart failure, and lower SAC and worse survival (60% vs. 82% in the NF/HG group, p<0.01).<br>3. Patients with AF were older, with higher resting HR and more symptoms.<br>4. Two-year survival was 60% in the LF/LG group compared to 85% in the NF/LG group, 82% in the NF/HG group and 78% in the LF/HG group (p<0.01).<br>5. Patients in the LF/LG group had higher all-cause mortality than in the other groups.<br>6. The low flow, low gradient pattern was the strongest predictor of mortality (p<0.01).<br>7. SAVR was associated with lower mortality of 69% in the LF/LG and NF/HG groups (p<0.01) but not in the NF/LG and LF/HG groups. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Mohty et al., 2014<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0560"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">55</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Retrospective study of 677 patients with severe AS (AVA ≤1 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>) with preserved LVEF (≥50%) treated by SAVR. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">1. The prevalence of paradoxical AS was 26%.<br>2. After SAVR, 54% of patients had PPM (AVAi ≤0.85 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>).<br>3. Of patients with LF-LG-AS, 56% had PPM.<br>4. Patients with LF-LG-AS and PPM were significantly older and had more comorbidities than those without LF-LG-AS or PPM.<br>5. Ten-year survival was significantly lower in patients with LF-LG-AS and PPM than those without LF-LG-AS or PPM (38% vs. 70%, p=0.002).<br>6. The combination of LF-LG-AS before surgery and PPM after surgery was associated with worse outcome. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Clavel et al., 2014<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0490"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">41</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Cohort study of 400 patients with moderate to severe AS, divided into two cohorts:<br>-Cohort A: 250 consecutive patients with paradoxical AS and severe AS with normal flow and high gradient (NF/HG), treated by SAVR;<br>-Cohort B: 150 non-consecutive patients with moderate to severe AS, preserved LVEF and normal flow, treated by SAVR. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">1. Patients with paradoxical AS had a greater prevalence of dyslipidemia and CAD, lower SVI, smaller LV chambers, lower MPG and higher Zva, compared to patients with NF/HG in cohort A.<br>2. The weight of excised valves was less and prevalence of bicuspid phenotype was lower in patients with paradoxical AS (15% vs. 42% in NF/HG patients).<br>3. Applying the cut-offs for weight of excised valves to indicate severity (≤2.0 g for males and ≤1.2 g for females), 70% of patients with paradoxical AS and 86% of patients with NF/HG had severe AS. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Maes et al., 2014<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0395"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">22</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Prospective study of 349 patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF, divided into two groups according to MPG:<br>-high gradient (n=144), MPG >40 mmHg;<br>-LF-LG-AS (n=205), MPG ≤40 mmHg. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">1. Patients in the two groups had similar clinical and demographic characteristics.<br>2. AF and diabetes were more prevalent in patients with paradoxical AS.<br>3. Patients with paradoxical AS had greater AVAi and ELCo, lower LVEDD and LVEDV, lower SVI and greater Zva, compared to patients with high-gradient AS.<br>4. All-cause survival at four years was higher in patients with paradoxical AS than in patients with high-gradient AS.<br>5. MPG was not significantly associated with four-year survival in patients with severe AS.<br>6. Patients with paradoxical AS were less often referred for SAVR than those with high-gradient AS (7% vs. 17%, p<0.01).<br>7. Survival without SAVR was better in patients with paradoxical AS than in those with high-gradient AS in the entire study population (p<0.01) and in symptomatic patients (NYHA class I or II) (p=0.002).<br>8. The variables independently associated with clinical outcome were age, LV volume, presence of COPD and diabetes, and NYHA class.<br>9. In symptomatic patients (NYHA class I or II), factors independently associated with clinical outcome were MPG, age, diabetes and LV volume.<br>10.SAVR significantly improved survival in both groups.<br>11. The protective effect of SAVR tended to be stronger in patients with high-gradient AS than in those with paradoxical AS, since the latter had better clinical outcomes when not operated.<br>12. 82% of patients with paradoxical AS evolved over time to a more severe form of AS, with increased MPG, and half of these developed severe high-gradient AS.<br>13. In patients with high-gradient AS, the minority who evolved to a low-gradient form developed the classical form of LF-LG-SA.<br>14. Survival of patients with paradoxical AS was better after SAVR than with medical therapy. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Lauten et al., 2014 <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0570"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">57</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Prospective study of 3077 consecutive patients from the GARY (German Aortic Valve Registry) registry treated by TAVR, divided into three groups:<br>-group 1: severe LF-LG-SA (LVEF ≤40%, MPG <40 mmHg, and AVAi ≤0.6 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>);<br>-group 2: paradoxical LF-LG-AS (LVEF ≥50%, MPG <40 mmHg and AVAi ≤0.6 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>);<br>-group 3: severe high-gradient AS (MPG ≤40 mmHg and AVAi ≤0.6 cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>). \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">1. Group 1 represented 11.7% of the study population, group 2 (paradoxical AS) 20.8% and group 3 60.6%.<br>2. Patients with paradoxical AS were slightly younger than those in group 3 (p<0.01) but older than those in group 1 (p=0.001); there were more females in groups 2 and 3.<br>3. Group 1 presented more comorbidities than groups 2 and 3, in which comorbidities were similar.<br>4. Mortality during hospitalization for SAVR was higher in group 1 than in group 3 (p=0.029) and similar between groups 2 and 3 (p=0.67).<br>5. At one year, there was a more marked difference between mortality in group 1 and mortality in the other two groups (32.3% vs. 22.3% in group 2, p=0.01, and 19.8% in group 3, p<0.001).<br>6. There was no significant difference in mortality between groups 2 and 3 one year after SAVR (p=0.192).<br>7. The rate of major cardiac and cerebral events at one year after SAVR was higher in group 1 than in the other two groups (group 1: 34.5% vs. group 2: 27.5%, p=0.021, and group 3: 23.8%, p<0.001).<br>8. Independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were 3-vessel CAD, pulmonary hypertension and peripheral vascular disease.<br>9. Specifically for patients with paradoxical AS, independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were 3-vessel CAD (p=0.018) and COPD (p=0.005). \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab1400713.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Studies on paradoxical aortic stenosis and their main conclusions.</p>" ] ] 6 => array:6 [ "identificador" => "upi0005" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAECOMPONENTE" "mostrarFloat" => false "mostrarDisplay" => true "Ecomponente" => array:2 [ "fichero" => "mmc1.docx" "ficheroTamanyo" => 27424 ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Supplementary Table 1</span> Quality assessment of studies analyzed for the systematic review of paradoxical aortic stenosis.</p>" ] ] 7 => array:5 [ "identificador" => "eq0005" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFORMULA" "mostrarFloat" => false "mostrarDisplay" => true "Formula" => array:5 [ "Matematica" => "AVAproj=AVArest+VC(250×Qrest)" "Fichero" => "STRIPIN_si1.jpeg" "Tamanyo" => 1929 "Alto" => 15 "Ancho" => 218 ] ] 8 => array:5 [ "identificador" => "eq0010" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFORMULA" "mostrarFloat" => false "mostrarDisplay" => true "Formula" => array:5 [ "Matematica" => "AVA×AA/AA−AVA" "Fichero" => "STRIPIN_si2.jpeg" "Tamanyo" => 1116 "Alto" => 14 "Ancho" => 121 ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0005" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:57 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0290" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012)" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "A. Vahanian" 1 => "O. Alfieri" 2 => "F. Andreotti" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1093/eurheartj/ehs109" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur Heart J" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "33" "paginaInicial" => "2451" "paginaFinal" => "2496" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22922415" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0295" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Epidemiology of valvular heart disease in the adult" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "B. Iung" 1 => "A. Vahanian" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1038/nrcardio.2010.202" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Nat Rev Cardiol" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "8" "paginaInicial" => "162" "paginaFinal" => "172" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21263455" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0300" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "R.A. Nishimura" 1 => "C.M. Otto" 2 => "R.O. Bonow" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.536" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Coll Cardiol" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "63" "paginaInicial" => "e57" "paginaFinal" => "e185" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24603191" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0305" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Hemodynamic determinants of prognosis of aortic valve replacement in critical aortic stenosis and advanced congestive heart failure" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "B. Carabello" 1 => "L.H. Green" 2 => "W. Grossman" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Circulation" "fecha" => "1980" "volumen" => "62" "paginaInicial" => "42" "paginaFinal" => "48" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7379284" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0310" "etiqueta" => "5" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "P. Pibarot" 1 => "J.G. Dumesnil" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Coll Cardiol Elsevier Inc" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "60" "paginaInicial" => "1845" "paginaFinal" => "1853" ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0315" "etiqueta" => "6" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Incremental prognostic value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "K. Kusunose" 1 => "A. Goodman" 2 => "R. Parikh" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002041" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Circ Cardiovasc Imaging" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "7" "paginaInicial" => "938" "paginaFinal" => "945" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25320287" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0320" "etiqueta" => "7" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and predictors of survival" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M.F. Eleid" 1 => "P. Sorajja" 2 => "H.I. Michelena" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003695" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Circulation" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "128" "paginaInicial" => "1781" "paginaFinal" => "1789" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24048203" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0325" "etiqueta" => "8" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "Z. Hachicha" 1 => "J.G. Dumesnil" 2 => "P. Bogaty" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668681" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Circulation" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "115" "paginaInicial" => "2856" "paginaFinal" => "2864" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17533183" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0330" "etiqueta" => "9" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Paradoxical low flow aortic valve stenosis: incidence, evaluation, and clinical significance" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M.-A. Clavel" 1 => "P. Pibarot" 2 => "J.G. Dumesnil" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s11886-013-0431-x" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Curr Cardiol Rep" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "16" "paginaInicial" => "431" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24343152" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0335" "etiqueta" => "10" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, small valve area, and low-flow, low-gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M.-A. Clavel" 1 => "J.G. Dumesnil" 2 => "R. Capoulade" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Coll Cardiol Elsevier Inc" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "60" "paginaInicial" => "1259" "paginaFinal" => "1267" ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0340" "etiqueta" => "11" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Low gradient “severe” aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "A. Ozkan" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2012.01.01" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Cardiovasc Diagn Ther" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "19" "paginaFinal" => "27" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24282693" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0345" "etiqueta" => "12" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Low-gradient aortic valve stenosis myocardial fibrosis and its influence on function and outcome" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "S. Herrmann" 1 => "S. Störk" 2 => "M. Niemann" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Coll Cardiol Elsevier Inc" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "58" "paginaInicial" => "402" "paginaFinal" => "412" ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0350" "etiqueta" => "13" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Deterioration of myocardial function in paradoxical low-flow severe aortic stenosis: two-dimensional strain analysis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "S.-P. Lee" 1 => "Y.-J. Kim" 2 => "J.-H. Kim" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Soc Echocardiogr Elsevier Inc" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "24" "paginaInicial" => "976" "paginaFinal" => "983" ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0355" "etiqueta" => "14" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis adding new pieces to the puzzle" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "P. Pibarot" 1 => "J.G. Dumesnil" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Coll Cardiol Elsevier Inc" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "58" "paginaInicial" => "413" "paginaFinal" => "415" ] ] ] ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0360" "etiqueta" => "15" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Metabolic syndrome is associated with more pronounced impairment of left ventricle geometry and function in patients with calcific aortic stenosis. A substudy of the ASTRONOMER (Aortic Stenosis Progression Observation Measuring Effects of Rosuvastatin)" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "A. Pagé" 1 => "J.G. Dumesnil" 2 => "M.A. Clavel" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Coll Cardiol Elsevier Inc" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "55" "paginaInicial" => "1867" "paginaFinal" => "1874" ] ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0365" "etiqueta" => "16" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: new evidence, more questions" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "P. Pibarot" 1 => "J.G. Dumesnil" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005718" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Circulation" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "128" "paginaInicial" => "1729" "paginaFinal" => "1732" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24048202" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0370" "etiqueta" => "17" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Outcome and impact of surgery in paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a cardiac catheterization study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "D. Mohty" 1 => "J. Magne" 2 => "M. Deltreuil" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000031" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Circulation" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "128" "numero" => "11 Suppl 1" "paginaInicial" => "S235" "paginaFinal" => "S242" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24030412" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 17 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0375" "etiqueta" => "18" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "J.G. Dumesnil" 1 => "P. Pibarot" 2 => "B. Carabello" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1093/eurheartj/ehp361" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur Heart J" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "31" "paginaInicial" => "281" "paginaFinal" => "289" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19737801" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 18 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0380" "etiqueta" => "19" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Improving assessment of aortic stenosis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "P. Pibarot" 1 => "J.G. Dumesnil" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Coll Cardiol Elsevier Inc" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "60" "paginaInicial" => "169" "paginaFinal" => "180" ] ] ] ] ] ] 19 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0385" "etiqueta" => "20" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "comentario" => "quiz 101-2" "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "H. Baumgartner" 1 => "J. Hung" 2 => "J. Bermejo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.029" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Soc Echocardiogr" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "22" "paginaInicial" => "1" "paginaFinal" => "23" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19130998" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 20 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0390" "etiqueta" => "21" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Invasive hemodynamic characteristics of low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "J. Lauten" 1 => "C. Rost" 2 => "O.A. Breithardt" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Coll Cardiol Elsevier Inc" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "61" "paginaInicial" => "1799" "paginaFinal" => "1808" ] ] ] ] ] ] 21 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0395" "etiqueta" => "22" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Natural history of paradoxical low-gradient severe aortic stenosis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "F. Maes" 1 => "J. Boulif" 2 => "S. Piérard" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.001695" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Circ Cardiovasc Imaging" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "7" "paginaInicial" => "714" "paginaFinal" => "722" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24777938" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 22 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0400" "etiqueta" => "23" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Demonstration of left ventricular outflow tract eccentricity by 64-slice multi-detector CT" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "S. Doddamani" 1 => "M.J. Grushko" 2 => "A.N. Makaryus" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s10554-008-9362-9" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Int J Cardiovasc Imaging" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "25" "paginaInicial" => "175" "paginaFinal" => "181" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18770012" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 23 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0405" "etiqueta" => "24" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Demonstration of left ventricular outflow tract eccentricity by real time 3D echocardiography: implications for the determination of aortic valve area" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "S. Doddamani" 1 => "R. Bello" 2 => "M.A. Friedman" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00479.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Echocardiography" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "24" "paginaInicial" => "860" "paginaFinal" => "866" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17767537" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 24 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0410" "etiqueta" => "25" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "J. Minners" 1 => "M. Allgeier" 2 => "C. Gohlke-Baerwolf" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1093/eurheartj/ehm543" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur Heart J" "fecha" => "2008" "volumen" => "29" "paginaInicial" => "1043" "paginaFinal" => "1048" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18156619" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0302283807010858" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "03022838" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 25 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0415" "etiqueta" => "26" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in aortic stenosis: a novel, simple, and reliable method to improve accuracy in area calculation" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "J.L. Gutiérrez-Chico" 1 => "J.L. Zamorano" 2 => "E. Prieto-Moriche" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1093/eurheartj/ehm467" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur Heart J" "fecha" => "2008" "volumen" => "29" "paginaInicial" => "1296" "paginaFinal" => "1306" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17989075" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 26 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0420" "etiqueta" => "27" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Stress echocardiography to assess stenosis severity and predict outcome in patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M.-A. Clavel" 1 => "P.V. Ennezat" 2 => "S. Maréchaux" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Elsevier Inc" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "6" "paginaInicial" => "175" "paginaFinal" => "183" ] ] ] ] ] ] 27 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0425" "etiqueta" => "28" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Clinical challenges in accurate assessment of severe aortic stenosis with a special focus on low-gradient aortic stenosis and normal ejection fraction" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "J. Barboza" 1 => "N. Krishnan" 2 => "K. Ananthasubramaniam" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/CRD.0b013e3182213f23" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Cardiol Rev" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "19" "paginaInicial" => "239" "paginaFinal" => "245" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21808167" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 28 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0430" "etiqueta" => "29" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Usefulness of the valvuloarterial impedance to predict adverse outcome in asymptomatic aortic stenosis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "Z. Hachicha" 1 => "J.G. Dumesnil" 2 => "P. Pibarot" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Coll Cardiol Elsevier Inc" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "54" "paginaInicial" => "1003" "paginaFinal" => "1011" ] ] ] ] ] ] 29 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0435" "etiqueta" => "30" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Valvuloarterial impedance does not improve risk stratification in low-ejection fraction, low-gradient aortic stenosis: results from a multicentre study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "F. Levy" 1 => "J. Luc Monin" 2 => "D. Rusinaru" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1093/ejechocard/jer022" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur J Echocardiogr" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "12" "paginaInicial" => "358" "paginaFinal" => "363" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21555457" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 30 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0440" "etiqueta" => "31" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Impact of valvuloarterial impedance on left ventricular longitudinal deformation in patients with aortic valve stenosis and preserved ejection fraction" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "S. Maréchaux" 1 => "É. Carpentier" 2 => "M. Six-Carpentier" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.acvd.2010.03.003" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arch Cardiovasc Dis" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "103" "paginaInicial" => "227" "paginaFinal" => "235" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20656633" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 31 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0445" "etiqueta" => "32" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Low-flow aortic stenosis in asymptomatic patients. valvular-arterial impedance and systolic function from the SEAS substudy" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "D. Cramariuc" 1 => "G. Cioffi" 2 => "Rieck ÅE" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "JACC Cardiovasc Imaging American College of Cardiology Foundation" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "390" "paginaFinal" => "399" ] ] ] ] ] ] 32 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0450" "etiqueta" => "33" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Assessment of myocardial mechanics using speckle tracking echocardiography: fundamentals and clinical applications" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "H. Geyer" 1 => "G. Caracciolo" 2 => "H. Abe" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Soc Echocardiogr Elsevier Inc" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "23" "paginaInicial" => "351" "paginaFinal" => "369" ] ] ] ] ] ] 33 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0455" "etiqueta" => "34" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Risk stratification in asymptomatic moderate to severe aortic stenosis: the importance of the valvular, arterial and ventricular interplay" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "P. Lancellotti" 1 => "E. Donal" 2 => "J. Magne" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/hrt.2009.190942" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Heart" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "96" "paginaInicial" => "1364" "paginaFinal" => "1371" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20483891" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 34 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0460" "etiqueta" => "35" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Relationship between longitudinal strain and symptomatic status in aortic stenosis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "D. Attias" 1 => "L. MacRon" 2 => "J. Dreyfus" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.echo.2013.05.004" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Soc Echocardiogr" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "26" "paginaInicial" => "868" "paginaFinal" => "874" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23768690" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 35 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0465" "etiqueta" => "36" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Prognostic value of global longitudinal strain in paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "K. Sato" 1 => "Y. Seo" 2 => "T. Ishizu" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Circ J" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "78" "paginaInicial" => "2750" "paginaFinal" => "2759" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25273913" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 36 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0470" "etiqueta" => "37" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Impact of myocardial fibrosis in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "F. Weidemann" 1 => "S. Herrmann" 2 => "S. Störk" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.847772" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Circulation" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "120" "paginaInicial" => "577" "paginaFinal" => "584" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19652094" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 37 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0475" "etiqueta" => "38" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Correlation of brain natriuretic peptide levels in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing operative valve replacement or percutaneous transcatheter intervention with clinical, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic factors and prognosis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "I. Ben-Dor" 1 => "S. Minha" 2 => "I.M. Barbash" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Am J Cardiol Elsevier Inc" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "112" "paginaInicial" => "574" "paginaFinal" => "579" ] ] ] ] ] ] 38 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0480" "etiqueta" => "39" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Measurement of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography: correlation with haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "C. Cueff" 1 => "J.-M. Serfaty" 2 => "C. Cimadevilla" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/hrt.2010.198853" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Heart" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "97" "paginaInicial" => "721" "paginaFinal" => "726" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20720250" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 39 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0485" "etiqueta" => "40" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Evaluation and clinical implications of aortic valve calcification measured by electron-beam computed tomography" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "D. Messika-Zeitoun" 1 => "M.C. Aubry" 2 => "D. Detaint" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1161/01.CIR.0000135469.82545.D0" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Circulation" "fecha" => "2004" "volumen" => "110" "paginaInicial" => "356" "paginaFinal" => "362" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15249504" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 40 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0490" "etiqueta" => "41" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: new insights from weights of operatively excised aortic valves" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M.-A. Clavel" 1 => "N. Côté" 2 => "P. Mathieu" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1093/eurheartj/ehu152" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur Heart J" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "35" "paginaInicial" => "2655" "paginaFinal" => "2662" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24755006" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 41 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0495" "etiqueta" => "42" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Impact of pressure recovery on echocardiographic assessment of asymptomatic aortic stenosis: a SEAS substudy" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "E. Bahlmann" 1 => "D. Cramariuc" 2 => "E. Gerdts" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.11.019" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "JACC Cardiovasc Imaging" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "3" "paginaInicial" => "555" "paginaFinal" => "562" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20541709" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 42 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0500" "etiqueta" => "43" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "D. Garcia" 1 => "J.G. Dumesnil" 2 => "L.-G. Durand" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Coll Cardiol" "fecha" => "2003" "volumen" => "41" "paginaInicial" => "435" "paginaFinal" => "442" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12575972" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 43 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0505" "etiqueta" => "44" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Prognostic value of energy loss index in asymptomatic aortic stenosis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "E. Bahlmann" 1 => "E. Gerdts" 2 => "D. Cramariuc" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.078857" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Circulation" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "127" "paginaInicial" => "1149" "paginaFinal" => "1156" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23357717" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 44 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0510" "etiqueta" => "45" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The feasibility of velocity vector imaging by transesophageal echocardiography for assessment of elastic properties of the descending aorta in aortic valve disease" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "J. Petrini" 1 => "M. Yousry" 2 => "A. Rickenlund" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.echo.2010.06.021" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Soc Echocardiogr" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "23" "paginaInicial" => "985" "paginaFinal" => "992" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20650603" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 45 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0515" "etiqueta" => "46" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Circumferential ascending aortic strain and aortic stenosis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "R. Teixeira" 1 => "N. Moreira" 2 => "R. Baptista" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1093/ehjci/jes221" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "14" "paginaInicial" => "631" "paginaFinal" => "641" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23125308" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 46 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0520" "etiqueta" => "47" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Clinical outcome, echocardiographic assessment, neurohormonal and collagen turnover markers in low-flow severe aortic stenosis with high transvalvular gradient" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "K. Piestrzeniewicz" 1 => "K. Łuczak" 2 => "M. Maciejewski" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Pol Arch Med Wewn" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "124" "numero" => "1–2" "paginaInicial" => "19" "paginaFinal" => "26" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24345982" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 47 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0525" "etiqueta" => "48" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Assessment of aortic stenosis severity: when the gradient does not fit with the valve area" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "P. Pibarot" 1 => "J.G. Dumesnil" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/hrt.2010.195149" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Heart" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "96" "paginaInicial" => "1431" "paginaFinal" => "1433" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20813724" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 48 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0530" "etiqueta" => "49" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Clinical outcome in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: insights from the new proposed aortic stenosis grading classification" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "P. Lancellotti" 1 => "J. Magne" 2 => "E. Donal" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Coll Cardiol Elsevier Inc" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "59" "paginaInicial" => "235" "paginaFinal" => "243" ] ] ] ] ] ] 49 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0535" "etiqueta" => "50" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Predictors of mortality and outcomes of therapy in low-flow severe aortic stenosis: a Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial analysis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "H.C. Herrmann" 1 => "P. Pibarot" 2 => "I. Hueter" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001290" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Circulation" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "127" "paginaInicial" => "2316" "paginaFinal" => "2326" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23661722" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 50 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0540" "etiqueta" => "51" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Velocity ratio predicts outcomes in patients with low gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved EF" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "N. Jander" 1 => "W. Hochholzer" 2 => "B.A. Kaufmann" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305763" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Heart" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "100" "paginaInicial" => "1946" "paginaFinal" => "1953" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25217488" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 51 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0545" "etiqueta" => "52" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Outcome of patients with low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "N. Jander" 1 => "J. Minners" 2 => "I. Holme" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.983510" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Circulation" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "123" "paginaInicial" => "887" "paginaFinal" => "895" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21321152" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 52 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0550" "etiqueta" => "53" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Systemic hypertension in low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M.F. Eleid" 1 => "R. Nishimura" 2 => "P. Sorajja" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003071" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Circulation" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "128" "paginaInicial" => "1349" "paginaFinal" => "1353" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23956211" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 53 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0555" "etiqueta" => "54" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Impact of aortic valve replacement on outcome of symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis with low gradient and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "A. Ozkan" 1 => "R. Hachamovitch" 2 => "S.R. Kapadia" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001094" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Circulation" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "128" "paginaInicial" => "622" "paginaFinal" => "631" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23812184" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 54 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0560" "etiqueta" => "55" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Prevalence and long-term outcome of aortic prosthesis-patient mismatch in patients with paradoxical low-flow severe aortic stenosis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "D. Mohty" 1 => "C. Boulogne" 2 => "J. Magne" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007819" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Circulation" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "130" "numero" => "11 Suppl 1" "paginaInicial" => "S25" "paginaFinal" => "S31" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25200051" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 55 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0565" "etiqueta" => "56" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Clinical outcomes of patients with low-flow, low-gradient, severe aortic stenosis and either preserved or reduced ejection fraction undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "C.J. O'Sullivan" 1 => "S. Stortecky" 2 => "D. Heg" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1093/eurheartj/eht408" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur Heart J" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "34" "paginaInicial" => "3437" "paginaFinal" => "3450" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24096324" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 56 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0570" "etiqueta" => "57" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "TAVI for low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved or reduced ejection fraction: a subgroup analysis from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY)" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "A. Lauten" 1 => "R. Figulla" 2 => "J. Köttins" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "EuroIntervention" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "850" "paginaFinal" => "859" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/21742049/0000003600000004/v1_201704230025/S2174204917300545/v1_201704230025/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "9924" "tipo" => "SECCION" "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Review Article" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/21742049/0000003600000004/v1_201704230025/S2174204917300545/v1_201704230025/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00004E&text.app=https://revportcardiol.org/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2174204917300545?idApp=UINPBA00004E" ]
Year/Month | Html | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
2024 November | 14 | 4 | 18 |
2024 October | 76 | 17 | 93 |
2024 September | 109 | 31 | 140 |
2024 August | 96 | 39 | 135 |
2024 July | 83 | 28 | 111 |
2024 June | 83 | 32 | 115 |
2024 May | 67 | 29 | 96 |
2024 April | 57 | 32 | 89 |
2024 March | 96 | 30 | 126 |
2024 February | 73 | 43 | 116 |
2024 January | 111 | 37 | 148 |
2023 December | 83 | 24 | 107 |
2023 November | 116 | 27 | 143 |
2023 October | 163 | 27 | 190 |
2023 September | 129 | 22 | 151 |
2023 August | 115 | 29 | 144 |
2023 July | 116 | 29 | 145 |
2023 June | 81 | 17 | 98 |
2023 May | 110 | 29 | 139 |
2023 April | 103 | 16 | 119 |
2023 March | 191 | 40 | 231 |
2023 February | 166 | 28 | 194 |
2023 January | 155 | 24 | 179 |
2022 December | 170 | 52 | 222 |
2022 November | 214 | 38 | 252 |
2022 October | 173 | 29 | 202 |
2022 September | 222 | 41 | 263 |
2022 August | 199 | 48 | 247 |
2022 July | 206 | 53 | 259 |
2022 June | 171 | 42 | 213 |
2022 May | 166 | 41 | 207 |
2022 April | 153 | 32 | 185 |
2022 March | 133 | 50 | 183 |
2022 February | 120 | 45 | 165 |
2022 January | 152 | 25 | 177 |
2021 December | 82 | 34 | 116 |
2021 November | 97 | 53 | 150 |
2021 October | 106 | 64 | 170 |
2021 September | 78 | 38 | 116 |
2021 August | 79 | 38 | 117 |
2021 July | 94 | 28 | 122 |
2021 June | 54 | 37 | 91 |
2021 May | 52 | 54 | 106 |
2021 April | 179 | 93 | 272 |
2021 March | 128 | 27 | 155 |
2021 February | 138 | 31 | 169 |
2021 January | 86 | 21 | 107 |
2020 December | 73 | 12 | 85 |
2020 November | 84 | 33 | 117 |
2020 October | 102 | 27 | 129 |
2020 September | 99 | 19 | 118 |
2020 August | 58 | 15 | 73 |
2020 July | 118 | 28 | 146 |
2020 June | 93 | 25 | 118 |
2020 May | 123 | 22 | 145 |
2020 April | 89 | 23 | 112 |
2020 March | 119 | 40 | 159 |
2020 February | 250 | 32 | 282 |
2020 January | 106 | 17 | 123 |
2019 December | 101 | 33 | 134 |
2019 November | 80 | 142 | 222 |
2019 October | 107 | 127 | 234 |
2019 September | 98 | 148 | 246 |
2019 August | 72 | 140 | 212 |
2019 July | 87 | 150 | 237 |
2019 June | 60 | 33 | 93 |
2019 May | 73 | 22 | 95 |
2019 April | 67 | 26 | 93 |
2019 March | 57 | 16 | 73 |
2019 February | 56 | 12 | 68 |
2019 January | 40 | 10 | 50 |
2018 December | 42 | 21 | 63 |
2018 November | 265 | 18 | 283 |
2018 October | 835 | 53 | 888 |
2018 September | 219 | 26 | 245 |
2018 August | 98 | 11 | 109 |
2018 July | 47 | 15 | 62 |
2018 June | 46 | 8 | 54 |
2018 May | 55 | 11 | 66 |
2018 April | 71 | 15 | 86 |
2018 March | 63 | 15 | 78 |
2018 February | 39 | 12 | 51 |
2018 January | 25 | 15 | 40 |
2017 December | 73 | 22 | 95 |
2017 November | 69 | 22 | 91 |
2017 October | 43 | 24 | 67 |
2017 September | 43 | 20 | 63 |
2017 August | 48 | 32 | 80 |
2017 July | 39 | 21 | 60 |
2017 June | 73 | 29 | 102 |
2017 May | 111 | 44 | 155 |
2017 April | 83 | 48 | 131 |