Coronary
Direct Admission Versus Interhospital Transfer for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.028Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Abstract

Objectives

This study sought to assess the influence of direct admission versus transfer via regional hospital to a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) center on time delays and 12-month mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients from a real-life perspective.

Background

Reduction of delays to reperfusion is crucial in a STEMI system of care. However, it is still debated whether direct admission to a PCI center is superior to interhospital transfer in terms of long-term prognosis. The authors hypothesized that compared with interhospital transfer, direct admission shortens the total ischemic time, limits the loss of left ventricular systolic function, and finally, reduces 12-month mortality.

Methods

Prospective nationwide registry data of STEMI patients admitted to PCI centers within 12 h of symptom onset and treated with PCI between 2006 and 2013 were analyzed. Patients admitted directly were compared with patients transferred to a PCI center via a regional non–PCI-capable facility in terms of time delays, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and 12-month mortality. Data were adjusted using propensity-matched and multivariate Cox analyses.

Results

Of the 70,093 patients eligible for analysis, 39,144 (56%) were admitted directly to a PCI center. Direct admission was associated with a shorter median symptoms-to-admission time (by 44 min; p < 0.001) and total ischemic time (228 vs. 270 min; p < 0.001), higher LVEF (47.5% vs. 46.3%; p < 0.001), and lower propensity-matched 12-month mortality (9.6% vs. 10.4%; p < 0.001). In propensity-matched multivariate Cox analysis, direct admission (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.11) and shorter symptoms-to-admission time (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.06) were significant predictors of lower 12-month mortality.

Conclusions

In a large, community-based cohort of patients with STEMI treated by PCI, direct admission to a primary PCI center was associated with lower 12-month mortality and should be preferred to transfer via a regional non–PCI-capable facility.

Key Words

12-month mortality
acute myocardial infarction
interhospital transfer
primary PCI
STEMI networks
time delays

Abbreviations and Acronyms

ACS
acute coronary syndrome(s)
AMI
acute myocardial infarction
ECG
electrocardiogram
IQR
interquartile range
LVEF
left ventricular ejection fraction
PCI
percutaneous coronary intervention
STEMI
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
TIMI
Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction

Cited by (0)

The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.