Mini-Focus Issue: Optical Coherence Tomography
Clinical Research
Diagnosis of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection by Optical Coherence Tomography

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.082Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Objectives

This study sought to assess the diagnostic value of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with suspected spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD).

Background

SCAD is a rare but challenging clinical entity.

Methods

Following a prospective protocol, OCT was performed in 17 consecutive patients with a clinical and angiographic suspicion of SCD from a total of 5,002 patients undergoing coronary angiography. A conservative management strategy was followed.

Results

OCT ruled out the diagnosis of SCAD in 6 patients with coronary artery disease (atherosclerotic plaques and/or intracoronary thrombus). In 11 patients (age 48 ± 9 years, 9 female), OCT confirmed the presence of SCAD. A double-lumen or intramural hematoma image was visualized in all cases. However, only 3 patients presented an intimal “flap” on angiography. OCT readily identified the intimal rupture site (n = 7), the thickness (348 ± 84 μm) and length (31 ± 9 mm) of the intimomedial membrane, the area of the true (1.1 ± 0.5 mm2) and false lumen (5.9 ± 2.1 mm2), the associated intramural hematoma (n = 9), and thrombi in the true or false lumens (n = 11). Most of these findings were angiographically silent. After stenting (n = 4), OCT disclosed adequate stent coverage, expansion, and apposition, but also residual intramural hematoma at the stented site (abluminal) and at the distal vessel.

Conclusions

OCT provides unique insights in patients with SCAD that allow an early diagnosis and adequate management. Most of these findings are undetectable by angiography.

Key Words

optical coherence tomography
spontaneous coronary artery dissection

Abbreviations and Acronyms

OCT
optical coherence tomography
SCAD
spontaneous coronary artery dissection

Cited by (0)

The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.