Clinical Research
Heart Rhythm Disorder
16-Year Trends in the Infection Burden for Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in the United States: 1993 to 2008

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.04.033Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Objectives

We analyzed the infection burden associated with the implantation of cardiac implantable electrophysiological devices (CIEDs) in the United States for the years 1993 to 2008.

Background

Recent data suggest that the rate of infection following CIED implantation may be increasing.

Methods

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) discharge records were queried between 1993 and 2008 using the 9th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM). CIED infection was defined as either: 1) ICD-9 code for device-related infection (996.61) and any CIED procedure or removal code; or 2) CIED procedure code along with systemic infection. Patient health profile was evaluated by coding for renal failure, heart failure, respiratory failure, and diabetes mellitus. The infection burden and patient health profile were calculated for each year, and linear regression was used to test for changes over time.

Results

During the study period (1993 to 2008), the incidence of CIED infection was 1.61%. The annual rate of infections remained constant until 2004, when a marked increase was observed, which coincided with an increase in the incidence of major comorbidities. This was associated with a marked increase in mortality and in-hospital financial charges.

Conclusions

The infection burden associated with CIED implantation is increasing over time and is associated with prolonged hospital stays and high financial costs.

Key Words

endocarditis
ICDs
infection
pacemakers

Abbreviations and Acronyms

CI
confidence interval
CIED
cardiac implantable electrophysiological device
HCUP
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project
ICD
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
ICD-9-CM
International Classification of Diseases-9th Revision, Clinical Modification
NHDS
National Hospital Discharge Survey
NIS
Nationwide Inpatient Sample
PM
pacemaker

Cited by (0)

Dr. Greenspon has served as a consultant to Medtronic; and has served as a speaker for and received honoraria from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and St. Jude Medical. Dr. Ho has a relationship with St. Jude. Dr. Pavri has received honoraria for lecturing/consulting from Medtronic and St. Jude Medical, and honoraria for lecturing from Biotronik and Boston Scientific. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.