The effects of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibition on hemodynamics, functional status and survival in advanced heart failure and pulmonary hypertension: A case–control study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.09.074Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

The goal was to examine the hemodynamic and clinical effects of long-term therapy with PDE5 inhibitor sildenafil (SILD) in patients with advanced, pre-transplant heart failure (HF) and severe pulmonary hypertension (PH), in comparison to a similar control group (CON).

Methods

In this non-randomized, retrospective case–control study, 32 middle-aged patients (81% males) with advanced systolic HF (80%  NYHA III, 56% ischemic) and severe pre-capillary PH (transpulmonary pressure gradient > 15 mm Hg) were studied before and after initiation of SILD (dose 73 ± 25 mg/day) and were compared to 15 CON patients, matched for key clinical characteristics (including PH severity, age and co-morbidities), not exposed to SILD. Changes at 3 months and the long-term outcome were compared between groups.

Results

SILD significantly reduced pulmonary vascular resistance (− 32% vs. baseline), transpulmonary gradient (− 25%) and increased cardiac output (+ 15%) compared to controls, without affecting systemic or ventricular filling pressures. SILD-treated subjects experienced an improvement in NYHA class and had a steady body weight which contrasted with significant weight loss in the CON group (by − 4.8%, absolutely by 4.3 ± 6 kg). During follow-up (median 349 days from baseline), 60% of patients underwent heart transplantation. Two patients in CON group had severe post-transplant failure of the right ventricle, none in SILD group. Overall pre- and peritransplant survival (censored 30 days after transplantation) was significantly better in SILD than CON group (93.7 vs 60%, p = 0.0048).

Conclusions

In patients with advanced HF and severe PH, SILD therapy has beneficial effects on hemodynamics, clinical status, cardiac cachexia, and contributes to improved peri-transplant survival.

Introduction

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) develops in 60% of patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure (HF) [1], [2] and is predominantly a consequence of elevated left atrial pressure transmitted backward into pulmonary circulation. However, structural remodelling [3] and endothelial dysfunction [4], [5] in the pulmonary vascular tree result in an increase of pulmonary vascular resistance in some HF patients, leading to severe PH that is “out-of proportion” to left atrial pressure. By overloading the right ventricle, PH causes right ventricular dysfunction and promotes the transition of left heart disease into biventricular failure which has high mortality [2]. Increased pulmonary vascular resistance, particularly if not reversible with a vasodilator challenge, is a crucial predictor of poor results of heart transplantation [6]. The underlying cause of such an adverse outcome is mainly acute post-transplant failure of the right ventricle of the graft suddenly exposed to vascular bed with elevated resistance [6]. Management of PH in the heart transplant candidates is therefore an issue of a critical importance.

Experimental animal studies have demonstrated that phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) is upregulated in the pulmonary vasculature in the HF state [7]. The inhibition of PDE5 enhances attenuated cGMP signalling and causes pulmonary vasodilatation in patients with HF and PH [5]. In several small clinical studies, long-term therapy with PDE5 inhibitor sildenafil was shown to decrease pulmonary vascular resistance, increase right ventricular function and improve exercise tolerance in patients with moderate heart failure without having serious adverse effects [8], [9]. Based on these positive preliminary findings, many heart transplant centers adopted off-label use of sildenafil in selected heart transplant candidates with severe PH as a salvage approach to achieve transplantability [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], despite the fact that long-term, randomized outcome studies are not available. In this study, we report on the hemodynamics and clinical course of the largest ever-published cohort of sildenafil-treated advanced HF patients and severe PH who are compared to similar control patients without PDE5 inhibitor therapy.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

This single-center, retrospective, non-randomised case–control analysis enrolled patients with advanced HF due to LV systolic dysfunction (EF < 40%) who were referred for pre-transplant evaluation to the Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine in Prague (IKEM). At IKEM, 40–50 heart transplantations are performed annually with a total of > 847 transplanted hearts since 1984. Patients in euvolemic hemodynamic state (right atrial pressure < 10 mm Hg) with severe pre-capillary component of

Results

Baseline characteristics are summarized in the Table 1. Due to the study design, both SILD and CON groups had an identical clinical and hemodynamic profile.

Discussion

Although several recent case-series have reported the effectiveness of PDE5 inhibition in the management of patients with advanced HF and severe PH [10], [11], [12], this is the first study that compares the clinical outcome of SILD-treated patients with control patients of similar clinical profile. This is an important point, since the “clinical stabilization effect” of chronic PDE5 inhibition may become apparent only when contrasted to a sliding clinical status of the control group. Three

Conflict of interest

Dr. Kautzner is a member of Advisory Board for GE Healthcare. Otherwise, there are no relationships with industry posing a conflict of interest in this paper.

References (31)

Cited by (36)

  • The Year in Cardiothoracic Transplant Anesthesia: Selected Highlights From 2020 Part II: Cardiac Transplantation

    2022, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
    Citation Excerpt :

    In this patient population, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been used successfully to reverse “fixed” PH when used as a bridge to HT, with good outcomes.3,4 The off-label use of sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, recently has been studied in an attempt to more noninvasively reduce pulmonary artery pressures.5 Mendes et al. conducted a retrospective, single-center observational study to determine the effects of sildenafil on 30 patients with fixed PH who were not transplant candidates.

  • Pulmonary vascular resistance as a potential marker of reactive pulmonary hypertension reduction following sildenafil therapy in patients disqualified from orthotopic heart transplantation

    2020, Advances in Medical Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    We showed that the results of the 6 MW test following sildenafil significantly improved in the responder compared to the non-responder group. Despite only modest improvement in the exercise performance, most of the patients from the responder group reported amelioration of HF symptoms which remains in agreement with other studies [23,45]. Apart from improvement in cardiac hemodynamic parameters there might also be a contribution of other actions of sildenafil such as improvement of cardiac geometry and diastolic function [45], perfusion of skeletal muscles [12] or reduction of fluid transition to the alveolar interstitium [21].

  • A comprehensive review on the potential therapeutic benefits of phosphodiesterase inhibitors on cardiovascular diseases

    2017, Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy
    Citation Excerpt :

    In this manner, riociguat and sildenafil ameliorate PHT due to left heart disease in mice [141]. A case-control study has shown that in patients with advanced HF and severe PHT, sildenafil therapy has beneficial effects on hemodynamics, clinical status, cardiovascular cachexia, and contributes to enhanced peri-transplant survival [142]. Diastolic Ca2+ waves in heart myocytes prompt arrhythmias by initiating postponed after-depolarizations.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Funding: This work was supported by a project of the Ministry of Health for Development of Research Organisation 00023001 (IKEM, institutional support); by the EU Operational Program Prague—Competitiveness: project CEVKOON (CZ.2.16/3.1.00/22126); by the grant GACR 305/09/1390; and by grant MSMT LK12052 (project KONTAKT II).

View full text