Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 373, Issue 9660, 24–30 January 2009, Pages 309-317
The Lancet

Fast track — Articles
Cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphism in young patients treated with clopidogrel after myocardial infarction: a cohort study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61845-0Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Clopidogrel and low-dose aspirin have become the mainstay oral antiplatelet regimen to prevent recurrent ischaemic events after acute coronary syndromes or stent placement. The frequent genetic functional variant 681 G>A (*2) of cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) is an important contributor to the wide variability between individuals of the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel. We assessed whether the CYP2C19*2 polymorphism affected long-term prognosis of patients who were chronically treated with clopidogrel.

Methods

Between April 1, 1996, and April 1, 2008, 259 young patients (aged <45 years) who survived a first myocardial infarction and were exposed to clopidogrel treatment for at least a month, were enrolled in a multicentre registry and underwent CYP2C19*2 determination. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and urgent coronary revascularisation occurring during exposure to clopidogrel. Follow-up was every 6 months. The key secondary endpoint was stent thrombosis proven by angiography.

Findings

Median clopidogrel exposure time was 1·07 years (IQR 0·28–3·0). Baseline characteristics were balanced between carriers (heterozygous *1/*2, n=64; homozygous *2/*2, n=9) and non-carriers (n=186) of CYP2C19*2 variant. The primary endpoint occurred more frequently in carriers than in non-carriers (15 vs 11 events; hazard ratio [HR] 3·69 [95% CI 1·69–8·05], p=0·0005), as did stent thrombosis (eight vs four events; HR 6·02 [1·81–20·04], p=0·0009). The detrimental effect of the CYP2C19*2 genetic variant persisted from 6 months after clopidogrel initiation up to the end of follow-up (HR 3·00 [1·27–7·10], p=0·009). After multivariable analysis, the CYP2C19*2 genetic variant was the only independent predictor of cardiovascular events (HR 4·04 [1·81–9·02], p=0·0006).

Interpretation

The CYP2C19*2 genetic variant is a major determinant of prognosis in young patients who are receiving clopidogrel treatment after myocardial infarction.

Funding

Délégation à la Recherche Clinique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris.

Introduction

Acute and chronic clopidogrel treatment in combination with aspirin can prevent recurrent ischaemic events after an acute coronary syndrome or a percutaneous coronary intervention.1 However, many patients on dual antiplatelet therapy still have thrombotic events. Attention has recently focused on the wide variability between individuals of response to clopidogrel,2 with poor inhibition of the platelet P2Y12 receptor in some patients.3 Persistent high platelet reactivity with clopidogrel treatment has also been associated with more frequent adverse events,4, 5 whereas a higher dose of clopidogrel or more potent drugs can help overcome such poor response and improve clinical outcome.6, 7, 8, 9, 10

High platelet reactivity with clopidogrel could be due to various reasons including polymorphism in the gene encoding the cytochrome P450 2C19 enzyme (CYP2C19), which contributes to the variability of platelet response to clopidogrel. Clopidogrel is a prodrug that has to be converted into an active metabolite that selectively and irreversibly binds to the P2Y12 platelet membrane receptor.11, 12, 13 CYP2C19 is a key enzyme in this activation process,14, 15, 16 and the presence of the loss-of-function CYP2C19 681G>A polymorphism (also called *2) is associated with reduced clopidogrel responsiveness in healthy people and in patients with coronary artery disease.17, 18, 19, 20, 21 However, the direct relation with adverse clinical outcome has not been shown.21

Myocardial infarction in patients younger than 45 years is a rare but serious thrombotic event, which is often treated by percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting and needs optimum and extended antiplatelet therapy. We assessed the effect of the CYP2C19*2 loss-of-function polymorphism in a cohort of young (<45 years) patients who survived a first myocardial infarction and were treated chronically with clopidogrel.

With consideration of the early and extended treatment with clopidogrel for secondary prevention of these patients, we decided to assess the effect of CYP2C19*2 polymorphism on their long-term prognosis during clopidogrel exposure. Only patients who were exposed to clopidogrel were assessed in this pharmacogenetic investigation.

Section snippets

Study design and eligibility

Between April 1, 1996, and April 1, 2008, 378 consecutive patients aged less than 45 years and who survived a myocardial infarction were enrolled in the ongoing AFIJI (Appraisal of risk Factors in young Ischemic patients Justifying aggressive Intervention) multicentre registry, which was dedicated to the management of premature coronary artery disease, including risk factors and genetic profiling. This programme was designed in 1996 to identify classic and unusual risk factors, as well as

Results

Of the 378 patients who entered the secondary prevention programme, 119 were not treated by clopidogrel because premature coronary artery disease had occurred before clopidogrel was made available in 1999 (figure 1). Thus we analysed 259 patients who were all treated by clopidogrel.

Most patients were white men with a high prevalence of familial history of coronary artery disease (table 1). Around half of patients were still actively smoking 3 months after the qualifying event (table 1). Other

Discussion

Results from our study have shown that CYP2C19*2 polymorphism greatly affects clinical outcome in a population of young patients with myocardial infarction on extended clopidogrel treatment with a long follow-up. This novel finding of a strong independent relation between CYP2C19*2 and recurrent coronary events is consistent in a subset analysis, with both acute and long-term effects, of stent-related and stent-independent coronary events.

The active metabolite of clopidogrel, which irreversibly

References (43)

  • SC Smith et al.

    AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update: endorsed by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

    Circulation

    (2006)
  • PA Gurbel et al.

    Clopidogrel for coronary stenting: response variability, drug resistance, and the effect of pretreatment platelet reactivity

    Circulation

    (2003)
  • DA Angiolillo et al.

    Variability in individual responsiveness to clopidogrel clinical implications, management, and future perspectives

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2007)
  • P Buonamici et al.

    Impact of platelet reactivity after clopidogrel administration on drug-eluting stent thrombosis

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2007)
  • W Hochholzer et al.

    Impact of the degree of peri-interventional platelet inhibition after loading with clopidogrel on early clinical outcome of elective coronary stent placement

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2006)
  • G Montalescot et al.

    A randomized comparison of high clopidogrel loading doses in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: the ALBION (Assessment of the Best Loading Dose of Clopidogrel to Blunt Platelet Activation, Inflammation and Ongoing Necrosis) Trial

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2006)
  • T Cuisset et al.

    Benefit of a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel on platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing coronary stenting

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2006)
  • M Lotrionte et al.

    Meta-analysis appraising high clopidogrel loading in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

    Am J Cardiol

    (2007)
  • SD Wiviott et al.

    Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes

    N Engl J Med

    (2007)
  • L Bonello et al.

    Adjusted clopidogrel loading dose to platelet reactivity measure decrease the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with clopidogrel resistance: a multi centric randomized, prospective study

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2008)
  • G Hollopeter et al.

    Identification of the platelet ADP receptor targeted by antithrombotic drugs

    Nature

    (2001)
  • P Savi et al.

    Identification and biological activity of the active metabolite of clopidogrel

    Thromb Haemost

    (2000)
  • P Savi et al.

    P2Y(12), a new platelet ADP receptor, target of clopidogrel

    Biochem Biophys Res Commun

    (2001)
  • JT Brandt et al.

    Common polymorphisms of CYP2C19 and CYP2C9 affect the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel but not prasugrel

    J Thromb Haemost

    (2007)
  • K Kim et al.

    The effect of CYP2C19 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel: a possible mechanism for clopidogrel resistance

    Clin Pharmacol Ther

    (2008)
  • JL Fayer Rehmel et al.

    Interaction of two major metabolites of prasugrel, a thienopyridine antiplatelet agent, with the cytochromes P450

    Drug Metab Dispos

    (2006)
  • P Fontana et al.

    Influence of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 gene polymorphisms on clopidogrel responsiveness in healthy subjects

    J Thromb Haemost

    (2007)
  • JS Hulot et al.

    Cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism is a major determinant of clopidogrel responsiveness in healthy subjects

    Blood

    (2006)
  • C Frere et al.

    Effect of cytochrome P450 polymorphisms on platelet reactivity after treatment with clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome

    Am J Cardiol

    (2008)
  • B Giusti et al.

    Cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism, but not CYP3A4 IVS10 + 12G/A and P2Y12 T744C polymorphisms, is associated with response variability to dual antiplatelet treatment in high-risk vascular patients

    Pharmacogenet Genomics

    (2007)
  • D Trenk et al.

    Cytochrome P450 2C19 681G>A polymorphism and high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity associated with adverse 1-year clinical outcome of elective percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting or bare-metal stents

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2008)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text