TY - JOUR T1 - Comment on “Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for patients with acute pulmonary embolism: an international, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial” JO - Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English edition) T2 - AU - Ferreira,Daniel SN - 21742049 M3 - 10.1016/j.repce.2012.02.002 DO - 10.1016/j.repce.2012.02.002 UR - https://revportcardiol.org/en-comment-on-outpatient-versus-inpatient-articulo-S217420491200030X AB - BackgroundAlthough practice guidelines recommend out-patient care for selected, haemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism, most treatment is presently inpa-tient based. We aimed to assess non-inferiority of outpatient care compared with inpatient care. MethodsWe undertook an open-label, randomised non-inferiority trial at 19 emergency departments in Switzerland, France, Belgium, and the USA. We ran-domly assigned patients with acute, symptomatic pulmonary embolism and a low risk of death (pulmonary embolism severity index risk classes I or II) with a computer-generated randomisation sequence (blocks of 2-4) in a 1:1 ratio to initial outpatient (ie, discharged from hospital ≤24h after randomisation) or inpatient treatment with subcuta-neous enoxaparin (≥5 days) followed by oral anticoagulation (≥90 days). The primary outcome was symptomatic, recur-rent venous thromboembolism within 90 days; safety outcomes included major bleeding within 14 or 90 days and mortality within 90 days. We used a non-inferiority margin of 4% for a difference between inpatient and outpatient groups. We included all enrolled patients in the primary analysis, excluding those lost to follow-up. This trial is reg-istered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00425542. FindingsBetween February, 2007, and June, 2010, we enrolled 344 eligible patients. In the primary analysis, one (0.6%) of 171 outpatients developed recurrent venous thromboembolism within 90 days compared with none of 168 inpatients (95% upper confidence limit [UCL] 2.7%; p=0.011). Only one (0.6%) patient in each treatment group died within 90 days (95% UCL 2.1%; p=0.005), and two (1.2%) of 171 outpatients and no inpatients had major bleeding within 14 days (95% UCL 3.6%; p=0.031). By 90 days, three (1.8%) outpatients but no inpatients had developed major bleeding (95% UCL 4.5%; p=0.086). Mean length of stay was 0.5 days (SD 1.0) for outpatients and 3.9 days (SD 3.1) for inpatients. InterpretationIn selected low-risk patients with pul-monary embolism, outpatient care can safely and effectively be used in place of inpatient care. ER -